this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
241 points (99.2% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2233 readers
149 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A catering contract to celebrate Black Heritage Month turned into a tough lesson for a Black-owned bakery in the South Bay earlier this month.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AFKBRBChocolate 70 points 9 months ago (2 children)

One of the articles I read said they wanted to make it up to her by letting her do some of their other events. She cancelled other orders, got staff working long hours, and bought a shit ton of ingredients so she could make 4000 pies for them, and they just said "Never mind" like it's no big deal.

[–] SinningStromgald 62 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think they need a better contract for large orders like that.

[–] CosmicTurtle 31 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Eh....having been on both sides of contracts like this.... typically a kill clause is sided heavily toward the one with money.

And even if it wasn't, Tesla has more money to drag out the fight in court long enough that the pie company won't be able to survive.

[–] ZMonster 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Is it unheard of for a bakery to establish arbitration agreements to avoid this exact situation? From my understanding, courts are reticent to insert themselves in arbitration unless the agreements made were invalid. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Tesla isn't going to call their lawyers for $4k. The phone call would cost more than just paying her. If she filed in small claims, chances are good they wouldn't even show up.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The order was $16,000. The amount of mini pies was 4k. You confused yourself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're right, my bad. That's likely a bit too much for small claims, so they might send in an intern or something.

But, Tesla's PR department will probably be giving her the $16k and apologizing for the "miscommunication" before too long.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

You would think tesla would, but who knows what they'll do if Musk decides he doesn't like her.

$16k is too much for small claims, but I believe she could get $10,000 from small claims and lawyers aren't allowed in small claims court in San Fran, so she should be able to just go directly after the person who placed and canceled the order.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

You would usually charge enough to break even in case of cancellation and only charge the "profit" part upon delivery...

[–] xhieron 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sounds an awful lot like detrimental reliance to me....

[–] ooterness 41 points 9 months ago

Sounds an awful lot like detrimental reliance to me…

Why is this getting downvoted?

Detrimental reliance is the legal principle that would allow the bakery to recover damages from Tesla. In summary: "You promised to pay me for this, and I acted accordingly, but you didn't follow through, so pay up."

[–] Vytle 14 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Yes because god forbid someone have the audacity to believe a corporation will behave in a professional manner.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Look up the legal definition of detrimental reliance.

[–] Th3D3k0y 3 points 9 months ago

I mean yeah, I don't know why anyone would legitimately expect this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

A corporation Musk is involved with?

[–] DigitalTraveler42 54 points 9 months ago (2 children)

A musk never pays his debts...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago

This joke Trumps mine

[–] VaultBoyNewVegas 6 points 9 months ago

One of the many many reasons he's called muskrat.

[–] Dkarma 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] ME5SENGER_24 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not just half, deposits should essentially cover costs. Then the other “half” is straight profit. Worst case you lose your profit

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Exactly. She just learned a very expensive lesson. You have to CYA first and foremost.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't trust any business with any big companies without up front payment.