this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
92 points (96.9% liked)

News

23618 readers
3881 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
JonsJava
rjc
Thekingoflorda
Tenthrow
gedaliyah
little_cow
jeffw
enu
92
Chicago scraps gunshot detection system accused of racial bias (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/news
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Johnson, a first-term mayor, campaigned on a promise to end the use of ShotSpotter, putting him at odds with police leaders who have praised the system.

They argue that crime rates – not residents’ race – determine where the technology is deployed.

And due to decades of racist policing focusing on communities based on residents' race those crime rates are based on exactly that.

This is why police forces love AI; they can feed the systems data based on their own history racist policing and absolve themselves of responsibility when the garbage coming out matches the garbage going in.

[–] mipadaitu 25 points 10 months ago

That's a bingo right there.

Just an excuse to continue to harass areas that have historically been harassed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Doesn't make any sense anyway. If I'm Whitey McWhiterson (I am, but if) and I want law enforcement protecting me and not minorities, I'd want this deployed in my neighborhood, right? Or is the false positive rate too high?

[–] lemmdogmillionaire 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not only is the false positive rate way too high, they’ve caught the company working with law enforcement to retroactively add fake data points to support raids and arrests.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You don't want that. Because at any given moment, kids are committing all sorts of minor violations. They trespass, stay out too late, get into scuffles, etc.

But now there's a cop watching you 24x7, and catches you smoking at 14 in a closed construction site with your friends... you get arrested cause the cop is a jackass. Now you've got a record, you missed a couple weeks of school, and college won't accept you, and your future is fucked.

You did the exact same thing that millions of other teens did, but because a cop happened to feel kinda like fucking you over, your life is ruined.

You DO NOT want cops patrolling your neighborhood, or anywhere you hang out.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I can't relate. I'll take your word for it but the only shenanigans I got into as a kid was sneaking into R rated movies. Oh I got busted once for sneaking into private property and having sex with my girlfriend. Owner wanted to press charges but the cop talked her out of it because I was 17 and maybe a month from shipping out for basic training. I've never had a negative interaction with a cop.

But you know I'm a pretty fucking boring person. Don't take that to mean I'm on the cops' side when they do stupid shit. I'm just not on team ACAB.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

...You realize you are agreeing with me, right? If that cop just felt like it, you would have been fucked, and there was nothing you could have done about it...

That is exactly what happens to minority kids all the time. I'm going to assume you're not black, cause that exact same situation with a black kid would have ended up with that kid not going to basic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

I never said I disagreed. I said I couldn't relate. I never smoked or broke into construction where I could represent an insurance liability or be blamed (rightly or wrongly) for missing equipment or graffiti. Sounds like the sort of thing a person ought to get in trouble for - white or black. We aren't arguing.

[–] Malfeasant 7 points 10 months ago

Or is the false positive rate too high?

I'll preface this by saying I have no idea how the system works, but I wouldn't be surprised. I have an old motorcycle that will occasionally get in a mood where it doesn't want to start. If I'm not in a rush, I'll let it sit a few minutes between tries, but if I have somewhere to be, I'll keep fighting with it and keep cranking the starter, which often leads to a massive backfire. I've made neighbors think someone's shooting before.

[–] lemmdogmillionaire 43 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not only is the false positive rate way too high, they’ve caught the company working with law enforcement to retroactively add fake data points to support raids and arrests.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/qj8xbq/police-are-telling-shotspotter-to-alter-evidence-from-gunshot-detecting-ai

[–] werefreeatlast 15 points 10 months ago

I want a cop GPS....a little map showing me alternate routes to work that avoid any one cop that may be on the way.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm not going to comment on the racial bias part as I have no data on any of that, but I'm not sure they use "AI" in any modern sense of the term. It's basically the same tech triggering the activation words of our voice activated home assistants but massively scaled.

I lived in a city with shotspotter long before modern AI was popular. It is a simply sound detection and triangulation as far as I'm aware.

The night it was activated, blanks were fired by police to calibrate the network. The next morning, there was an article that the system detected and triangulated 4 additional shots.

[–] sylver_dragon 5 points 10 months ago

I work in a field where "AI" has been all the rage for the last few years (cybersecurity). In my experience, if a vendor touts that their product uses "AI", run. Run far, far away. The one thing AI is really good at is turning noisy data into a fuck ton of false positives. And I can't imagine any noisier data than the noise in a city (pun not intended). Cities are a 24x7 cacophony of loud noise and you expect anything to pick out and triangulate gun shots? Sure, they are loud as can be, but that sound also reflects and there are lots of other loud sounds to deal with. And that doesn't even touch on the problem of unscrupulous police forces using either bad data or just making shit up about the data to go harass people. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

[–] TIMMAY 2 points 10 months ago

Oh oh I saw this episode of Elementary!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

*scraps eventually. It's better than nothing, but they are signing a new contract through September of this year, supposedly so CPD can "transition appropriately" for the next six months, whatever that entails.

[–] Rapidcreek -4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

First you deploy this technology to the areas that you know have been experiencing gunfire. Several microphones are used and when gunfire is "heard" by the server, it can be triangulated to the source location. If you have a video network, you can also move to the source. Guess the server program is not identifying the gunshot frequency correctly.

[–] AA5B 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So we need to know both the range and the false positive rate, as well as the response

  • are they deployed so the only places in range of detection are non-white areas?
  • is there a high rate of false positives that somehow is worse in non-white areas?
  • is the response different in non-white areas vs white areas?
  • does the response specifically target non-white people in the target area?
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

I'd imagine there's a higher prevalence of gunshots in the non-white areas so more mics are placed there.

[–] FireTower 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Part of the problem is that there's other loud noises that sound like gunshots like a car backfiring.