this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
211 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

32173 readers
483 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DirkMcCallahan 61 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Privacy isn't dead, but it will be soon because those of us who seriously care about it are the 0.001%.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago

The article states why that's a bad mentality I'm the first few paragraphs

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

So you think we are roughly 81K People?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

In my social circle, aside my partner, I have only (1) friend who cares. No one else does. Lile at all. I get harassed as to why I an not on WhatsApp or FB by family.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Well thanks a lot, now I'm sad.

[–] SteefLem 33 points 10 months ago

No. Its just slowly being chocked to death

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

After all the fuzz about Mullvad having used Gmail for email and now self-hosting, have you checked what EFF uses for email ? So long privacy !

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There isn't a a lot of options for public facing organizations. It kind of sucks but it is true.

Also email isn't private or secure and it will never be private or secure unless you use gpg everywhere with everyone. Even with gpg you still have a public identity.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There isn’t a a lot of options for public facing organizations. It kind of sucks but it is true.

Really ?

Also email isn’t private or secure

Agreed.

and it will never be private or secure unless you use gpg everywhere with everyone. Even with gpg you still have a public identity.

One problem with GnuPG is that it will take a lot of effort to make normies use it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

EFF and Fastmail for email seems like a perfect match. And Fastmail has servers in the USA which EFF might appreciate :)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, I have, have you?

From their website: Legal Assistance and General Information

For legal assistance requests, general questions, or miscellaneous queries: [email protected] [email protected] PGP public key GPG Key Fingerprint: F2F2 1BB8 531E 9DC3 0D40 F68B 11A1 A9C8 4B18 732F Signal Number (text only): 510-243-8020. To verify it's us, you can check the safety numbers for the conversation. Either the first half or the second half of the safety numbers should read one of the following:35593 90536 26981 58470 03363 72867 or 38948 48795 16727 63104 76636 96731.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Look up their MX records : Microsoft email

[–] TCB13 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

In true EFF fashion. Their second server / backup MX is hosted at some other smaller company so things could be worse, at least their MX as a non Microsoft alternative.

Either way I can get this, they most likely have hundreds of people using Microsoft products, like Office 365, and Outlook's compatibility with IMAP is a joke. They most likely also don't want to run a serious in-house email infraestruture capable of handling that load. All reasons might have driven them to Microsoft / O365.

This is usually what happens, when your company is big you can't make it with open-source without tons of extra costs and complexities. Sad but true.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hell, even SMB really can't easily/cost-effectively run without MS.

Sad, but true.

[–] TCB13 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Unfortunately it can't either be run in a solid and stable way EVEN with MS. The Windows' SMB client sucks as well.