this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
23 points (87.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7146 readers
116 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NABDad 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think the rule is: if a headline asks a question, the answer is always "no".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Yup:

Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

fluffpiece punctuated with "PLEASE PAY FOR OUR VERY IMPORTANT JOURNALISM" ok nyt lemme get right on top of that for you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

… and the credulous 33% of the population?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Almost four years have passed since Congress approved and Donald Trump signed a huge relief bill designed to limit the financial hardship created by the Covid-19 pandemic.

In fact, according to a Federal Reserve survey, the percentage of Americans “doing at least OK financially” was actually higher in July 2020 than it had been before the pandemic, presumably because for many people, government aid, including one-time checks and greatly enhanced unemployment benefits, more than made up for lost jobs and business.

Furthermore, fears that generous aid during the pandemic would undermine America’s work ethic — that adults would leave the labor force and never come back — proved totally wrong.

The trick here is that they pretend 2020 never happened — a sleight of hand that only works because federal aid allowed so many Americans to emerge from the pandemic slump in good financial shape.

For example, in 2019, she shepherded a bipartisan agreement to suspend the debt ceiling, averting a potential financial crisis, with a deal that Trump himself conceded contained “no poison pills.”

Oh, and a significant fraction of Republicans, Trump included, would prefer to block aid to Ukraine because, by all appearances, Vladimir Putin is their kind of guy, and they’re content to see him steamroll his democratic neighbor.


The original article contains 892 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!