this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
778 points (98.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5503 readers
3079 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] poopsmith 51 points 8 months ago (6 children)

I wonder how these hold up in fires.

[–] Buffaloaf 35 points 8 months ago (15 children)

I've seen hay bales catch fire from being too wet, no way I'm building a house out of that.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, same as wood, who would build houses out of that? /s

Hay is great insulation and it's sealed with protective material anyway in modern houses. Also, even if not: Some tribes make houses out of hay or straw and those houses are quite great in their particular circumstances. There are experiments to use hay bales for structural support as well and it holds up surprisingly well.

Also, fun fact: wooden houses are less dangerous in case of fire than houses made of steel and concrete because the steel rod reinforcements start becoming soft at low temperatures (~200°C) and crash. Wooden houses announce crashing when burning, concrete buildings don't.

[–] HeyMrDeadMan 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Something something jet fuel...

[–] RedditRefugee69 6 points 8 months ago
[–] phoneymouse 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

How does that work? Too wet with kerosene?

[–] Buffaloaf 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The moisture and organic material causes mold and bacteria to form and create heat. Because hay is a good insulator, heat will build up more and more. Once the hay gets to a certain temperature flammable gases are formed and can combust from the heat.

[–] topinambour_rex 4 points 8 months ago

And as the heat raises, it becomes perfect for other bacterias, which start to multiply too, increasing more the heat

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So flammable mater + low airflow is somehow more fire resistant than flame resistant mater + low airflow? Looks like the source is pure marketing unless their comparable insulation is perforated cardboard coated in fuel gel.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Roof/attic often uses rockwool or glasswool. Wall insulation is often something like XPS, PIR or PUR.

Although it sounds counterintuitive, I can see straw doused in flame retardant being better than supposedly flame retardant polystyrene foam made from hydrocarbons. I mean, just look at what happened with Grenfell Tower.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

flame removedant

lemmy.ml is replacing some of your word with another one. Good ol' Scunthorpe problem!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"doused in flame retardant" isn't mentioned in the source as far as I saw, plus it would affect the eco-friendly, workability, cost effectiveness, and biodegradability benefits mentioned (though the last one is worthy of debate as a pro or con in the first place). Everything has its tradeoffs unfortunately. This could be the better side for some surely.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

From what I have read they are using a loam layer on both sides of the wall, I doubt that this affects eco-friendliness and biodegradability. And they are F90 certificated. source

[–] phoneymouse 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

From the article…

Since straw bales are tightly packed, they do not burn as easily as certain other materials. The tight packing reduces airflow, something that is critical to sustain a fire. While there is some fire risk during the construction phase (as is the case with many building materials), once the home is finished, it’s flame retardant nature decreases the risk, usually resulting in a home that better resists burning than a traditional stick built house.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (5 children)

"...better than a traditional stick built house"

I'm thinking of brick, what do we think folks? Seems like we have three possible building materials with one clear winner amirite?

[–] phoneymouse 11 points 8 months ago

Only the big bad wolf can help us decide

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kameecoding 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well hemp bricks hold up well so I am guessing they improved upon this too to be more fire retardant

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CosmicCleric 2 points 8 months ago

I wonder how these hold up in fires.

Only sell to non-smokers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0ddysseus 35 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I built my own strawblae house and have worked on half a dozen others. I have designed 3 award winning homes, one of them was strawbale.

Mice aren't a problem, the walls are sealed with clay (inside) and lime (outside) render, the mice can't get in.

Same with fire, the straw is tight and sealed, they don't burn. In huge bushfires in southern Australia a few years back, several families sheltered I a strawbale home as the fire passed.

Moisture not a problem if you have proper eaves and footings, which you will cos you design it properly, right?

Loads of massive benefits over brick or stick built.

I have no data on wolves sorry, but definitely dropbear proof

Happy to answer any questions.

[–] Filthmontane 8 points 8 months ago (12 children)

My biggest question is: why?

If it's safe from mice, bugs, and fire, then it just seems like the housing equivalent of wearing a boot on your head. You can do it. It's not hurting you or anyone around you. But it's kinda just weird. Is there some sort of benefits to this over a normal house? Or is it just a boot on your head?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

The next benefit is, that concrete has a very bad CO2 footprint. Straw as an organic renewable resource has a very good CO2 footprint.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you're going to seal it, why not just use mud, clay or whatever ground/dirt instead? Probably won't need to be as thick to give similar insulation.

Also, what about impact resistance? Can an angry punch break that outer lime layer?

What's the tallest one of these buildings can get?

[–] 0ddysseus 10 points 8 months ago

Well, because straight earth as in mudbrick (or concrete, normal bricks etc) is not insulation. That's thermal mass. It stores energy. Insulation (like strawbales) slows heat movement. So you need insulation on the exterior and thermal mass on the interior for a properly thermally regulated building.

At 2 inches thick of limestone, you can sure bust it up with a sledgehammer or similar. A punch won't do much more than hurt your hand. Still, if you take tools to the majority of homes they break quite fast.

Couldn't say houw tall they can get but from memory I think I've seen 3 stories? Over that you're talking more full on construction. I've seen a 4 story using super bales that was in an commercial carpentry shop

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago

Straw bale houses can be made really well, and are ecologically superior building material. I've seen some straw bale houses that are fancy af

[–] kaffiene 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Straw bale houses are awesome and have been around for centuries

[–] Frozengyro 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Just a little problem with an the mice

[–] Cheems 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Shapillon 3 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

The straw is sealed inside and outside with clay.

[–] someguy3 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Structurally timber. Checkmate wolves.

(Yes I know the story.)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm already in your house 🐺😋

[–] someguy3 11 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Just put bricks on the outside and you've got a wolf-proof house

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If they're affordable, I'll take one.

[–] Agent641 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Mmm sorry, Citadel just bought them all, but you can rent one for 85% of your wage.

[–] bouh 10 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately in France you won't be able to rent for more than 33% of your wage. Sorry, you'll be homeless instead.

[–] iAvicenna 7 points 8 months ago

If they cant find houses let them stay in barns

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Big Bad Wolf was propaganda by Big Cinder.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Learn history or be doomed to repeat it

load more comments
view more: next ›