Yes, it's disbelief based on lack of sources, more than anything.
kilgore_trout
joined 2 years ago
Bad photographers complaining to be called out as bad photographers.
Their distribution of books is completely legal.
Corporations just have more money to warp the laws in their favour.
That's why the Archive is appealing: they still believe they are right.
Wikipedia requires attribution, which AI scrapers never give.
It is "public" work, but under a license.
Then maybe it shouldn't grow.
It seems a very valid reason to give up your privacy.
You could present your valid argument without calling in homophobia.
Until the soon presidency of Hungary.
Hungary will have the presidency, not the total control. They propose discussions but the vote in the Council is still majority based.
The second sentence of OP should have started with "Scientific research"
view more: next ›
Why are we not using them in end-user devices