this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
468 points (95.7% liked)

memes

10447 readers
2875 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fox2263 38 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I don’t know like. Have you ever slept next to a woman? They generate about a Dyson spheres suns worth of heat.

[–] DarkDiamondK 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Damn, you got that model, mine is just subzero temp freezer, but it balances out since Im practically a nuclear reactor of heat

[–] fox2263 7 points 10 months ago

It is useful in winter.

I’m normally cold except if I’ve had a late takeaway or a drink, then I turn in to a furnace 🤣

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This clearly a lie. Their feet temperature are close to absolute zero

[–] fox2263 8 points 10 months ago

The duality of woman

[–] Anticorp 5 points 10 months ago

Depends on the woman. My wife puts out more heat than a nuclear reactor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

That...that explains why they consider all environments to be immeasurably cold. If they're radiating all that heat, any exterior environment seems like 0 degrees Kelvin.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago (2 children)

But it's in incomplete list. Without boobs, it isn't a fair comparison.

[–] Mannimarco 21 points 10 months ago

Boobs are pretty neat

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

But no nipples

[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A trillion of an SI prefix will always be silly. Just use a bigger prefix!

[–] spicytuna62 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

While I agree, most people know tera- at this point. Most people probably do not know zetta- yet.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Most of us aren't used to "terrawatts" though. Is that like one Earth worth of watts? One watt as measured on Earth? The definition of watt culturally accepted by Earthlings?

[–] spicytuna62 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

You wouldn't find a terawatt in everyday usage, but a terawatt-hour is pretty commonplace when talking about the energy usage of entire populations.

This Reuters article states US power demand will climb to "4,027 billion kWh in 2022." Yeah, just say 4 PWh. Or even 4,027 TWh. It's a little more easily digested.

It's already an incomprehensably high number. No matter which way you state it is going to fly over peoples heads.

And the entire electricity consumption of the planet is something like 25.5 petawatt-houts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

They say it like that because people are used to being billed in kWh so it gives them a reference.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I think theperson you're replying to was making a joke off the misspelling of "terrawatts" in OP.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Oh that's super interesting and I did not know that, but I was riffing off the double R in "terrawatt," instead of "terawatt."

Like "tera" describes an order of magnitude, but "terra" means "earth," as in "terra firma," "terra nova," or "terran."

So I guess you could say that 25.5 petawatt-hours = 25,500 terawatt-hours = 1 terrawatt-hour.

[–] zzzz 6 points 10 months ago

And how're we supposed to learn when y'all keep dumbing shit down?

[–] edgemaster72 23 points 10 months ago

There's another way a girlfriend is like a Dyson sphere. I don't have a Dyson sphere.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

The size of your mother. ✔️ ❌

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

how can women be expected to compete against the dyson sphere? it’s all over for us, smh 😔

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your gf doesn't do that? Weird.

[–] Ziglin 5 points 10 months ago

Is your girlfriend perchance a Dyson Sphere?

[–] robolemmy 11 points 10 months ago

So you’re into power exchange relationships? sup?

[–] Anticorp 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Hold up! Isn't a Dyson sphere pretty low maintenance once it's built?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Yeah it's a misconception, it's the Dyson swarm that's high maintenance

[–] Fedizen 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I doubt it. A structure like that would be an enourmous engineering project pummeled by solar radiation on the inside and space debris on the outside.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

I guess it would depend on the temperature resistance and how the power is transmitted. Even solar panels wear out, and the collection surfaces of a dyson sphere would be a lot higher temp. But with something that scale, I'd imagine it would be a ton of maintenance work even if was a tiny amount per area.

[–] schema 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean wouldn't you still have to maintain the electrics of a sun sized surface? I guess you could use its own power for maintenance robots...

[–] Anticorp 1 points 10 months ago

All I know is that Picard's Enterprise found a long abandoned Dyson Sphere and it was still functional.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I would like to submit an analogy that accurately communicates how overrated Dyson spheres are:

Dyson sphere = non-trebuchet catapult

Dyson ring = trebuchet

Fact.