thanks_shakey_snake

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah lol spinning this as "backing out" seems like a stretch. But if the headline was like "Trump campaign prefers to wait for formal nominations before planning debate," then it would not drive much engagement.

Kind of a nothing story, IMO.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 9 hours ago

Kenneth, you don't want to be a page forever.

Who said I've been alive forever?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Oh cool! Is there any non-mobile app/service that does something similar?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Or even if you do know it by name, it won't show you that one first-- No no, it will show you 3-5 sponsored copycats first, then down below the fold, you can find the app with the exact name you searched for.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Elect Joe lights

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

But why are they orang-- oh wait I see it now.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You taking 10 to 30 years to ask yourself that is exactly what private equity is betting on.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Ah okay, lol. Sounds like you've got it under control.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Ben Shapiro is exactly who I've heard this in reference to. In his case, it's like an avalanche of "facts" and stats and stuff, which may be real in some sense or have some grain of truth, but it's not like you're going to be able to fact check them on the spot, or look at the data with the appropriate care and nuance to figure out how to interpret it... He just looks informed and the opponent looks baffled so he wins I guess.

Donald Trump on the other hand just does this free-associating stream of consciousness rambling that I'm not sure is even lucid enough to count... Like I don't think he's usually trying to mount arguments or seem like "the smartest in the room" the way Ben Shapiro is, he just... Says stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Oh, no, I mean I have an account, but I never (...exceedingly rarely) go on Facebook itself. messenger.com is just the messenger with no feed or other features, and there's a standalone mobile app called Messenger as well, same idea. I use those when I need to interact with someone over Facebook so that I'm not exposed to most of the crap.

I don't know anything about using it totally without any account.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Yeah I think the full aphorism was "The customer is always right in matters of taste."

 

I keep interacting with systems-- like my bank, etc.-- that require (or allow) you to add one or more trusted devices, which facilitate authentication in a variety of ways.

Some services let you set any device as a trusted device-- Macbook, desktop, phone, tablet, whatever. But many-- again, like my bank-- only allow you to trust a mobile device. Login confirmation is on a mobile device. Transaction confirmation: mobile device. Change a setting: Believe it or not, confirm on mobile device.

That kind of makes sense in that confirming on a second device is more secure... That's one way to implement MFA. But of course, the inverse is not true: If I'm using the mobile app, there's no need to confirm my transactions on desktop or any other second device, and in fact, I'm not allowed to.

But... Personally, I trust my mobile device much less than my desktop. I feel like I'm more likely to lose it or have it compromised in some way, and I feel like I have less visibility and control into what's running on it and how it's secured. I still think it's fairly trustworthy, but just not categorically better than my Macbook.

So maybe I'm missing something: Is there some reason that an Android/iOS device would be inherently more secure than a laptop? Is it laziness on the part of (e.g.) my bank? Or is something else driving this phenomenon?

 

👀🍿

 

I'm planning to open a new chequing account in the near future, and I'm contemplating bailing on RBC. I've been with them for a very long time, and one possible outcome is that I'll just open a new RBC account and be done with it. That'd be... fine.

But for a variety of reasons (including my satisfaction with RBC trending steadily downward), I'm thinking about opening this new account elsewhere. I don't have a ton of hard requirements, and I'm not really sure what to look for in a bank, but the following would be nice:

  • Good online banking experience, particularly desktop (RBC is shockingly bad at this)
  • Good credit card; easy to make payments from the new account
  • Minimal fees
  • Easy e-transfers
  • Real security (another thing RBC is terrible at)
  • Neat rewards would be cool
  • Low-fee, low-friction investing would also be cool-- I don't really do much investing, but I'd like to be able to

Any suggestions would be great, including anti-suggestions if you happen to know of a bank that I should avoid.

 

Sure Todd, lol

 

For reference (as per Wikipedia):

Any organization that designs a system (defined broadly) will produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization's communication structure.

— Melvin E. Conway

Imagine interpreting that as advice on how you should try to design things, lol.

Tbf, I think most of the post is just typical LinkedIn fluff, but I didn't want to take the poor fellow out of context.

view more: next ›