this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024

156 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18828 readers

5208 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

156

Ronnie Long's wrongful conviction is shocking — Unless you study the US justice system (www.usatoday.com)

submitted 7 months ago by gAlienLifeform to c/politics

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The wrongful conviction of Ronnie Long might appear shocking: No physical evidence, false testimony, a conflicting description of the suspect – then 44 years in prison for Long.

But experts and advocates aren't surprised: They say U.S. prisons are filled with potentially thousands of innocent people. While Long's case is particularly egregious, experts told USA TODAY some of the factors that led to his imprisonment are still causing wrongful convictions today.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240117125405/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/01/12/ronnie-long-exonerated-many-innocent-in-prison/72187322007/

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Black people comprise 53% of the 3,200 exonerations listed in the registry, making African Americans seven times more likely than their white counterparts to be falsely convicted of serious crimes, according to the organization's report. Potkin said that racial disparities in wrongful conviction mirror disparities seen throughout the criminal justice system including policing, jury selection and pretrial detention.

Remember things like this next time someone is telling you how systemic racism doesn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Or a presidential candidate says we are not a racist country.

[–] gAlienLifeform 8 points 7 months ago

And she was supposed to be the respectable establishment moderate choice in that primary

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I'm not disagreeing with you, but it's important to note that Haley said the US was never racist. What she said about the country that had race-based chattel slavery, one drop laws that made you a non-citizen if any of your ancestors were people of color, and riots when black children tried to go to school was, and I quote, “We’re not a racist country...We’ve never been a racist country.”

Later on in the campaign Vivek Ramaswamy would end his candidacy after a poor performance in Iowa. At least one voter said they voted against him because he 'reminds me of 9/11'. Ramaswamy is American-born and of Indian descent. India had nothing to do with 9/11.

[–] Viking_Hippie 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I also like to point out to those people the fact that, while white Americans use recreational drugs at a slightly higher rate than black Americans, black Americans are arrested for it 10 times as much per capita.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

not just arrested more often. once they're arrested, a black person is more likely than a white person to be criminally charged. once charged, a black person is more likely to be convicted. once convicted, a black person is more likely to get a custodial sentence instead of some sort of rehab, and if they both get custodial sentences a black person's is likely to be longer.

But yeah, the rate of self-reported drug use shows no statistically significant correlation to race.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Now, do the calculation again, but by gender.

And then do it again, and this time use race AND gender.

[–] Boddhisatva 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Always remember, when you read stories like these, that the wrong done to the person who has been wrongfully convicted is only one aspect of the tragedy. The other aspect is that the investigators' myopic focus on convicting this individual has allowed the actual murderer to remain free to kill again.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Don't be black in america or you're going to have a bad time