this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
106 points (97.3% liked)

Ukraine

8414 readers
853 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³πŸ’₯ Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

πŸ’³βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

πŸͺ– 🫑 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fuck.

Like, yeah thats not safe distance by US standards if thats a munitions truck, but he seems to have gotten pretty damned unlucky.

Never says a thing. Must have taken shrapnel to the brain.

War is hell.

Another family without a son thanks to Putin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Also one fewer Russian soldier thanks to Putin

[–] HardlyCrabbing 13 points 1 year ago

The Ukrainians are lucky they are so fucking stupid

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

believe or not, there are formulas for this, you need to know how much of the explosive is there and how much, if any, fragmentation will form. these distances can easily go into kilometers

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's good to know.

So, what is a safe distance?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Check out this research: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/6/9/331

An explosives safety separation distance, ESSD, from a substance, article, or structure with reacting material, specifically burning material, is one where an individual would not receive second degree burns and would not be exposed to hazardous debris (<79 Joules) at a density greater than one fragment per six hundred square feet

The table below from this site shows an appropriate evacuation distance...

I'd presume the amount of explosive munitions in that burning truck was on the high end...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I love how they mix US and Metric units.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What could go wrong?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

In Russia, where he belonged. Now he's fertilizer for a yard or two of sunflowers

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Generally if an industrial accident/fire is bigger than your outstretched thumb, you're too close.

Since this has actual shaped projectiles in it, imma say double

[–] peopleproblems 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the footage of the sky as all that shit is raining down is pretty cool

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

sparks like this are burning iron (aluminum would be whiter), which means lots of steel fragmented and some ignited

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Is that the moon at the end, perhaps?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Too bad he wasn’t closer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago