this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
37 points (83.6% liked)

politics

19149 readers
3896 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter
aidan
jordanlund
HLMenckenFan
little_cow
37
Iowa Caucus Megapost! (self.politics)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by jordanlund to c/politics
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm putting this up early since it's likely I won't have time tomorrow.

Monday, 1/15, is the date of the Iowa Caucus, please direct all comments, links, and replies involving that here!

Edit - 5:36 PM Pacific, 7:36 PM Iowa time, 8:36 PM Eastern - MSNBC declares Trump the winner (shock!)

8:23 PM Pacific, 10:23 PM Iowa time, 11:23 PM Eastern. MSNBC declares Desantis #2, Haley #3.

Final Results:
Iowa had 40 delegates to assign out for the convention. A candidate needs 1,215 delegates to become the official nominee.

Donald Trump - 51% - 56,260 votes - 20 delegates
Ron DeSantis - 21.2% - 23,420 votes - 9 delegates
Nikki Haley - 19.1% - 21,085 votes - 8 delegates
Vivek Ramaswamy - 7.7% - 8,449 votes - 3 delegates
Ryan Binkley - 0.7% - 774 votes
Asa Hutchinson - 0.2% - 191 votes
Chris Christie - <0.1% - 35 votes
Other candidates - <0.1% - 84 votes

Edit Next Up - 1/23 - New Hampshire Primary!

For those unaware, a caucus is totally unlike a primary.

In a primary election, you show up to a polling place, you cast your ballot for your chosen candidate, the ballots get counted, and whoever wins is whoever wins. On to the next state!

A caucus is far, far more chaotic.

https://apnews.com/article/how-iowa-caucus-works-2024-democrats-republicans-592ab40b9b9b948c0540f2cf132bab5c

"The Republican caucuses will convene statewide at 7 p.m. local time (8 p.m. EST), and begin with the election of a caucus chair and secretary. Only registered Republicans may participate in the caucuses and only in their designated home precincts. However, Iowans may register or change their party affiliation on caucus day. Voters must turn 18 by the November general election in order to participate."

"There is no walking around the caucus room to form candidate preference groups. That voting method was a feature of Democratic caucuses from 1972 to 2020 but is no longer in use by either party in 2024."

"The binding presidential vote functions essentially like a party-run primary, only with very limited polling hours and no accommodation for absentee voting, except for a tiny handful of overseas and military voters. There are speeches on behalf of various candidates before the voting and a variety of party business after the vote. Individual caucus chairs are allowed to exercise some discretion in how to conduct the vote, but the voting is done by secret ballot and there is no set list of candidates. Voters must be given the option to vote for any candidate they choose. In the past, some caucus sites have pre-printed the names of major candidates and provided a write-in option, but typically, voters vote by writing the name of a candidate on a blank slip of paper."

The "limited polling hours" is key here, because if you decide to step out for a smoke, or to hit the bathroom, or grab a sandwich when the vote is called, you might not get counted at all.

In previous years this has led to accusations of under-counts, over-counts, and all other manner of shenanigans.

Here's the history of the past few Iowa Caucuses and how it related to the general election:

2016:
Ted Cruz - 8 Delegates, 51,666 votes
Donald Trump - 7 / 45,429
Marco Rubio - 7 / 43,228
Ben Carson - 3 / 17,394
Rand Paul - 1 / 8,481
Jeb Bush - 1 / 5,238
Carly Fiorina - 1 / 3,485
John Kasich - 1 / 3,474
Mike Huckabee - 1 / 3,345

2020:
Donald Trump - 39 Delegates, 31,421 votes
Bill Weld - 1 / 425

Sources:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Iowa_Republican_presidential_caucuses

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Iowa_Republican_presidential_caucuses

General Elections:

2016:
Trump/Pence - 800,983
Clinton/Kaine - 653,669

2020:
Trump/Pence - 897,672
Biden/Harris - 759,061

Sources:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election_in_Iowa

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_Iowa

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How the fuck trump has conned the American populace to still vote for him blows my mind. Literally cannot understand...

[–] return2ozma 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] jordanlund 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Which makes no sense on the face of it since James Woods is a conservative...

But then that's exactly the sort of person who has "beforeitsnews.com" as their home page.

[–] kescusay 5 points 10 months ago

It doesn't have to make sense. It just has to work within the framework of her political preconceptions.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

the only way any of this matters is if - in a few months - Trump is, somehow, stricken from the ballots in enough states to matter or is ruled as ineligible to run at all. or if he dies.

otherwise, he'll be the GOP candidate, and these also-rans will be as irrelevant then as they are now. if he chooses on as a running mate, it'll be based on their ability to kiss his ass, not really on the polls.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, we need more than Colorado and Maine to step up

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

well, since it's gone to SCOTUS, don't expect much movement until they make a ruling. Honestly, i expect them to realize that the only thing they can do is say, "it's a state issue," and kick it back down to the states to decide who gets on what ballot.

the only thing they might dip their toe in on is what is or is not "insurrection", although i rather doubt it because i don't know whether that's actually an issue being challenged.

[–] derphurr 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They literally cannot kick it back to states. It would mean anyone could file civil lawsuit in any state and it would be arbitrary up to whatever judge to bar federal candidate from the ballot. Then it might go to judgment call by a state Supreme Court (with or without appeals courts) and/or a secretary of state.

If SCOTUS kicked it back to states it's already been declared that about 30 states will immediately remove Biden from the ballot.

[–] jordanlund 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Biden's not in violation of the 14th Amendment. There's no basis to remove him.

But also, largely, in this case, we're talking about a primary ballot and Biden isn't even on all of them in the first place. See New Hampshire.

[–] derphurr 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If SCOTUS leaves it up to states, and leaves it self executing for 14th. It means anyone can file civil action.

You might think Biden is not in violation of 14th, but many Republican secretary of states DO think so. It's very vague just like used in CO, "given aid or comfort to the enemies" will be up to courts to interpret.

[–] jordanlund 1 points 10 months ago

The big argument they are making for Biden and the 14th is failing to secure the border, the problem with that argument is that the people gathering at the border are not enemies and the countries they come from are not enemies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

If SCOTUS kicked it back to states it’s already been declared that about 30 states will immediately remove Biden from the ballot.

this won't happen because there would need to be cause, which there isn’t. Trump wasn’t just arbitrarily removed from the ballot in CO and ME. He was legally disqualified for violating the 14th Amendment. So, unless Biden also did that, is under 43 years old, or was born in another country, there’s no legal basis to remove him from any ballot or disqualify him from the office of President.

They literally cannot kick it back to states.

of course they can by saying that the state’s ruling stands because it’s up to the states to run their own elections, which it is.

[–] derphurr 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

they can by saying that the state’s ruling stands because it’s up to the states to run their own elections, which it is.

Do you know what SCOTUS even if? No states cannot interpret 14th Amendment because it's "their" election. SCOTUS has final say.

And there are many arguments against Biden giving aide to the enemy, which if you are paying attention to the Republicans have listed their many arguments they will use in court. I suggest you read their articles of impeachment as a starting point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It’s funny, you mention that, because they’ve been trying that shit for a year in Congress, and it’s gotten absolutely nowhere. But go on like it’s actually something that might happen.  There has to actually be a crime, and proof that that happened. Since there isn’t either…

[–] jordanlund 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't think they're going to rule on Trump and insurrection at all because that's the subject of a criminal case.

There's no way they're going to put the thumb on the scale and determine guilt or innocence in a case that hasn't even happened yet.

Saying "Yes, Trump is an insurrectionist, remove him from the ballot" or "No, it's fine, he can stay." would do exactly that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

well, it’s 2 issues there, really— 1) whether a state can remove Trump (or anyone) from a ballot (or maybe just a primary ballot) and 2) whether Trump committed insurrection (an issue which may preclude the other issue). They may decide to rule on issue 1 and ignore issue 2 for the reason you mentioned, or they may (more likely) decide to say that issue 1 is a state issue (which it is) and ignore issue 2 altogether as, like you said, it’s an ongoing matter in lower courts.

[–] Bye 4 points 10 months ago

Trump will be on the primary ballot in CO. The court put a stay on its own order.

[–] jordanlund 10 points 10 months ago

66% of Republican caucus goers say Biden did not legitimately win the 2020 election.

[–] robocall 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The thing I dislike about the Iowa caucus is it has to be held in person for a few brief hours. The right to vote is sacred. but it's taken away from first responders like cops, firefighters, paramedics, and hospital employees that have to work during those hours. There are also retail and service worker employees that can't get off work during those hours. I hope Iowa ends the caucus and switches to voting for their primaries for future elections. The right to vote should never be infringed upon.

[–] jordanlund 7 points 10 months ago

There are entirely too many states with caucuses. But the Democratic party in Iowa is doing theirs by mail, you just have to request a ballot:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/iowa-democrats-new-caucus-process-work/story?id=106133768

[–] jordanlund 9 points 10 months ago

59% of Republican caucus goers support a federal abortion ban.

[–] jordanlund 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Ramaswany drops out, endorses Trump.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/15/us/politics/vivek-ramaswamy-drops-out.html

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

He endorsed Trump long before dropping out.

No one is running against Trump because no one can beat him. Trump is the definition of the gop and the American far right. They’re only running in the hope of either Trump dying before the election, Trump actually facing prison time and being forced to drop out, or getting a cabinet job.

[–] return2ozma 3 points 10 months ago

[–] jordanlund 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

63% of Republican caucus goers say Trump is fit to be president if he's convicted.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Blergh.....

A race to see which gets the privilege of restricting my bodily autonomy and demonizing me as a threat to civilization. Fuck em all, I was paying attention to the last few races but now I am gonna insulate myself from the whole myopic process.

[–] jordanlund 2 points 10 months ago

I'm really just in it for the inevitable Ron Desantis concession speech. :)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Does Iowa have a weather plan?

[–] RampantParanoia2365 4 points 10 months ago

Be snowed on?

[–] jordanlund 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are a bunch of different plans organized around getting people to the polls, particularly the elderly. But, yeah, it's an added layer of complication.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cool beans. I hope they will offer similar services to the Democratic period if needed!

[–] jordanlund 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The Democratic caucus in Iowa is being done completely differently:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/iowa-democrats-new-caucus-process-work/story?id=106133768

"Unlike their Republican counterparts, the Iowa Democratic Party will not host an in-person presidential preference contest, opting instead for mail-in ballots listing incumbent President Joe Biden, Minnesota Rep. Dean Phillips, Marianne Williamson, and an option for "uncommitted."

The party started accepting requests for these cards via a Google form on the party's website and by mail on Nov. 1, 2023. And while they will start to be mailed out to voters on Jan. 12, they will not be accepted in person at the caucuses.

All cards must be postmarked by March 5, a date when more than a dozen other states hold their primaries, otherwise known as Super Tuesday."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Wow, cool, thanks for sharing!

[–] return2ozma 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Literally popcorn buckets to count the vote. MURICA 🤣

[–] jordanlund 2 points 10 months ago

Now, in fairness... each caucus site is run by volunteers.

[–] citrusface 1 points 10 months ago

Sure they wiped out the butter. Give them some credit

[–] jeffw 4 points 10 months ago

DeSantis just took second, per CNN

[–] return2ozma 3 points 10 months ago

CNN calls it for DeSantis second place

[–] Rapidcreek 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Washington Post: “To some here, the Iowa caucuses are an exemplar of democracy, binding communities together and allowing everyday voters to connect with candidates who, a year from now, may be running the country. To others, they are an antiquated system that excludes those who — due to a disability, a work shift, a flat tire, child care needs, extreme weather or any other factor — can’t turn up on the one night every four years when Iowa voters get a say in picking presidential nominees.”

“Voters must be at their precincts at 7 p.m. Central time on Monday, where they will hear speeches from representatives of the candidates, fill out ballots and, if they want, observe as the votes get tallied. No early or absentee voting is allowed, except for a tiny number of military service members.”

The final Emerson College poll in Iowa finds 55% of Republican caucus voters plan to support Donald Trump on Monday evening, while 21% support Nikki Haley, and 15% Ron DeSantis.

Since the last Emerson poll in December, Trump’s support has increased five points, from 50% to 55%, while Haley’s support increased four points, from 17% to 21%.

[–] jordanlund 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] assassin_aragorn 3 points 10 months ago

That should be terrifying to Republicans

[–] jordanlund 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Here we go! Too early for results just yet! Sooon!

[–] kescusay 2 points 10 months ago

Everyone's already calling it for Trump, and it's not even close.

[–] return2ozma 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

NBC News live coverage just started for those without cable/streaming services:

https://www.youtube.com/live/6ivENhL6sv4

[–] jordanlund 2 points 10 months ago

Nice! The Caucus doesn't start for another hour or so, they must be doing set up stuff.