this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
326 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2448 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mightyfoolish 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

🤨 🤔 🤷‍♀️

Domes would totally protect us from all of of the government drones that have been flying around for the past couple hundred million years or so. Also turbines and cats. I like cats.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

The world is only 2024 years old. Read a colander, maroon!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What about some kind of curtain? Make it with something strong like iron?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Dumb "Dome" Donny... an entire book of nicknames is waiting to be published.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Domehead Don

[–] buddascrayon 8 points 11 months ago

Ok Davros, calm yer tits before you go suggesting we genetically mutate our whole race into a bunch of hateful squids in tin cans trying to EXTERMINATE the rest of the universe. 😒

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

This is not The Simpsons Movie nor Crysis 3.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

"We’re going to have the greatest dome ever," he continued.

I swear, this guy talks like a seven-year-old child. Guess that's what his supporters understand.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

And voting Democrat protects us from Trump's neurosyphilis!

[–] KJ118 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

My planned d&d setting that took place in a country on the brink of invasion that turns to a magical dome for protection and the fallout from the total isolation from that decision feels a lot less fun now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] youCanCallMeDragon 6 points 11 months ago

We are living in the worst timeline

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The orange idiot probably thought this was a documentary:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Imagine thinking the U.S. doesn’t already have one hell of an anti-missile defense system. No one has launched a rocket at the U.S., but if they did, that shit would absolutely get intercepted

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_ 5 points 11 months ago

Giant dome over Mar a lago, his TV room in the White House, and the nearest McDonalds. That's what he means.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

This looser did not even manage to build a wall at the Mexican border (and failed to make the Mexicans pay for it). And now he wants to build a f-ing dome?

[–] bop_bimmy 5 points 11 months ago

Simpson's did it.

[–] mo_ztt 4 points 11 months ago

Show the video, not this voiceover bollocks

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

An artistic representation of the concept, courtesy of the Simpsons

As an added bonus, it should solve climate change concerns as well.

[–] anon_8675309 4 points 11 months ago

What a tool.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›