this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
549 points (98.2% liked)

Political Memes

5510 readers
1372 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HelloHotel 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

what was the logic of allowing ANY form of slavery at all?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Logically, slavery as punishment for crime is actually pretty reasonable and theoretically good. The criminal isn't just taken care of by the state, thus costing the people even more, instead, they actually have to pay for their crime by working it off.

But reality intrudes upon this theoretical situation. Since someone benefits from the criminal's work, there's now incentive to imprison as many people as possible. It creates perverse incentives that cannot possibly be avoided.

But almost as bad a perverse incentive is the for profit prison system, even if they aren't allowed to force prisoner labor. Because for profit prisons again have the incentive to imprison as many people as possible since that makes them more money; anything that reduces incarceration rate means less money for them.

Of course, we have both of these going for us. For profit prisons that make more money off the state the more prisoners they have, and the permission to force labor from them since the Constitution specifically allows it, thus letting the prisons make money twice off each prisoner. Yay!

[–] zloubida 9 points 6 months ago

Yeah even theoretically it's a bad idea. You can't revoke the fundamental rights of people, even criminals, or the fundamental rights are not fundamental anymore, thus endangered for everyone, not just criminals.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In this context? Probably so that prisons pay for themselves. Or the loophole was intentional – it seems rather obvious that Southern states could pass arbitrary laws and enforce them willy-nilly, targeting minorities or whoever fell out of favor of the ruling class.

[–] HelloHotel 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

that's the overview answer, mabe better put, how did the justify this to the lawmakers?

[–] PugJesus 6 points 6 months ago

how did the justify this to the lawmakers?

In the 19th century, it was widely believed that people were criminals because of moral deficiency, and that hard labor would have a positive effect in reforming them into good, upstanding members of society.

This is not really connected to reality in any way, but fits with the popular protestant theology of the time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I am not even a US citizen and I'm making guesses based on my limited knowledge of its history. You'll have to ask someone else.