this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
1364 points (96.0% liked)

Science Memes

9223 readers
2422 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What's your evidence, Richard Easton??!?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It goes to show that being a good actress doesn't mean that you can't also be good at tech, even if you don't like to to brag about it.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please 64 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Reminds me of that time someone got into a Twitter beef with Rage Against The Machine. They dropped the “it’s not like you have a degree in political science or anything” line. The lead guitarist went to Harvard for social sciences.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I totally agree with the first part (can't agree with the second because I'm not an honors grad, not in political science, and not from Harvard)

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like both of Brian Mays carreers. The one as the guitarist of Queen, and the one as an astrophycisist

[–] IphtashuFitz 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Saw Queen perform with Adam Lambert a few months ago. They played one or two pieces written by Brian May that really tied those two professions of his together. It blows my mind that he’s worked with NASA and the like quite a bit over the years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

In the year of '39,

[–] Aceticon 2 points 2 months ago

I'm from a Tech and Science background (unfinished Physics degree, most-definitelly-finished EE degree and then about 2 decades at the bleeding edge of Informatics) and some years ago came in contact with the Theatre Acting world for a couple of years whilst living in London (UK), doing various short courses, seeing fringe Theatre and getting acquainted with various (not famous) actors and directors.

Most were surprisingly (for me, at the time, with my pre-made ideas from my Science background and 2 decades in Tech) intelligent people.

Good acting using modern acting techniques and good directing do require quite a lot of brains to pull do well, IMHO, since in things like method acting well before there's any acting of what's on a script, there's a whole process of analysing them and various techniques for discovering the emotions of the character (best I can describe in a short space), at least for stage acting.

The only main difference in capabilities, I would say, is that at least in Acting there is a much higher proportion of Extroverts than Introverts, the very opposite of the proportion in Science and Tech, and Introverts are the ones with the personality type that's detailed oriented and hence more likely to come up with things like new or changed processes for doing things (IMHO).