this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
597 points (98.4% liked)

196

16591 readers
2537 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 92 points 7 months ago (19 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (7 children)

In 2042 you'll be 62ish or something I don't wanna think about math, but that's around the average American life expectancy and isn't too bad.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Maths understander here, in 2042 they'll be 60, not 62. Also the average life expectancy in the US is around 77-78 years, i.e. enough of a difference compared to 60 that you could more or less fit (and live to see) a grandkid/great-grandkid's entire childhood in there.

Although that 79 years figure is Life Expectancy at Birth, in practice it tends to be longer for most surviving adults older than a certain point, mostly because the lower ranges of the chart hit their allotted moment and pass on for whatever reason, leaving the remaining average higher still

~~Of course, with calculus living rent free in my head rn thanks to the uni course of the same name, I'm wondering what that chart of "current age vs expected remaining age" looks like, and where the point of "ageing faster than your remaining likely time grows" lies~~

Edit: source turned out to be a little out of date (although they always tend to bicker a little on the exact number), corrected for it

[–] richtellyard 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

That's very interesting, thank you

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)