this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7411 readers
629 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ontario is in the process of shifting the cost burden of trash away from municipalities and onto companies that make and sell products that generate waste. 

With this shift — called "extended producer responsibility" — industry now bears the full costs of recycling or recovering such items as tires, batteries, light bulbs and electronics. 

Under the system, companies pay fees, based on the amount of waste material they create, to businesses that manage recycling programs, known as producer responsibility organizations (PROs). 

It's up to the companies to choose whether to pass those fees on to consumers or to absorb them as a cost of doing business. The theory is that the fees provide the companies with an incentive to reduce their packaging and other waste.

For material that fills up blue boxes — including beverage containers, paper, plastic, glass and metal — the transition to industry paying the full costs only began last year and is to be completed by 2026.

Right now, companies are seeing their blue box fees shoot upward exponentially. 

The government is facing corporate pressure to change Ontario's plan that sees industry taking on the full cost of blue box recycling programs.

The industry is "trying to shirk its environmental responsibilities,"

"If producers are not paying for this packaging, it's going to be taxpayers, it's going to be the environment or it's going to be human health, and that would be a massive step backwards," Wallis said in an interview.  

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

~~If~~ producers are not paying for this packaging, it's going to be taxpayers, it's going to be the environment or it's going to be human health 

FTFY 

[–] NarrativeBear 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

After reading this article I started wondering if there are any foods and products I buy that come in fully compostable packaging.

The only one I seem to be able to think of is egg cartons, but I wonder if the ink on the packaging is harmful.

Though I hope the Ontario government follows through on its decisions and holds manufactures and retailers responsible for taking back packagings and products that reach their end of life use.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

pizza boxes can be composed in my community, or paper bags that have food oils in them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

A lot of whole foods can be bought without packaging. They offer plastic bags to put your veggies in, but you don't really need them most of the time. Also, if it's a possibility, a lot of local farmers markets tend to offer more sustainable packaging.

It would be cool if this opened up a market niche for grocers offering zero waste or fully reusable packaging.