this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
211 points (80.2% liked)

News

23306 readers
3688 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bernie_Sandals 48 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Socialist Party of America, Socialist Alternative, The Communist Party of the USA, and plenty others have been trying to run left of the Democratic Party for a century, it won't work in a FPTP voting system, converting the Democrats into a Socialist party would literally be easier.

If you want a left wing party other than the Dems, you're gonna have to change FPTP first.

[–] Eldritch 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Or or, and hear me out here. We could do what has happened many different times throughout history. And take over/replace the structure of a party. The Democrats already ignore state and local elections across several red states. What if we lefties/socialist/etc instead of trying to prop up separate parties and separate candidates that always fail. Fielded our own candidates who more closely match our own ideals. And run them as Democrats in these areas. Focusing on funding them ourselves as well as whatever money the DNC apparatus might provide. We might actually start winning. And if we start winning we might actually be able to replace those in the DNC. And if we replace those in the DNC. Things might actually get better.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that what they said?

converting the Democrats into a Socialist party would literally be easier

[–] Bernie_Sandals 0 points 7 months ago

Yeah it was, but they added more context on how it was possible, so I wouldn't really say it was redundant.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This is what the DSA has been trying to do and succeeding in for 30 years with candidates like AOC

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Succeeding? They’ve elected a tiny handful of candidates over the last thirty years so now that’s success? Lol, sounds like something a right wing Democrat would say, because that’s a very convenient result for the party itself. You’re either blindly loyal to this party or you must think we’re stupid.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

They’ve elected a tiny handful of candidates over the last thirty years so now that’s success?

Almost all of which were elected in the past decade, that's rather quick for a political change as large as that. And more are being elected every year.

The DSA literally helped Bernie almost win the presidential primary, that wouldn't of even come close to happening if the average Democrat was some right wing anti-socialist hawk.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They propped up a Zionist who is now campaigning for Genocide Joe

[–] Bernie_Sandals 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

When the military is deployed to crush protestors and trans people have their existence banned by Trump I'll know who to thank.

Kinda weird yall insist on calling him Genocide Joe.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't care what nonsense falls out of his demented mouth as long as he is sending bombs to an ongoing genocide

[–] Bernie_Sandals 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do you really and honestly believe that Joe Biden Is so evil that he's been sitting there relishing in the deaths of civilians for months?

And you do realize that sending weapons is not the sole discretion of the president? About 75% if congress keeps voting to send those weapons.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago

I could care less what he feels as he snuffs out the lives of children in Gaza.

Last Monday, the U.S. State Department deemed Israel in compliance with President Biden’s landmark national security memorandum issued in February. That memorandum required that recipients of U.S. weapons must demonstrate compliance with international law, and that they not interfere with or block the delivery of humanitarian aid.

Yes, it's absolutely in his discretion, and the lies his State Department are telling to continue doing so are outrageous and absurd.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wait-5-moths-before-calling-a-genocide-a-genocide AOC?

[–] Bernie_Sandals 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

What do you think that purity testing gets you?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Everyone has purity tests, everyone has red lines. None are more reasonable than genocide.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

She said it was a humanitarian catastrophe from day one of the invasion and called for an immediate ceasefire soon after. Just because she didn't use the exact word you want, a hugely legally binding and implicating one too mind you, you're willing to write her off?

You do realize that if that is your standard then literally no member of congress or in the executive is good enough for you, right?

Not to mention that it'd be hugely irresponsible for any government official to make a comment like that before the ICC ruling is actually finished.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

You think it's irresponsible to call this a genocide before the ICC comes to a verdict in 20 years?

[–] endhits 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Communist Party is a fed honeypot

[–] Bernie_Sandals 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Lmfao, yeah how long has that been the case? Since they realized I was right and switched to endorsing leftist dems and protesting?

[–] givesomefucks -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

converting the Democrats into a Socialist party would literally be easier.

They're a private organization...

They'll keep doing whatever they want without changing as long as people keep voting for him.

The only thing the DNC has that a different private party wouldn't is momentum.

If they just gonna keep following the rnc, we have no choice but acknowledging we were abandoned long ago already

[–] dariusj18 13 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The DNC is a national political party organization. Every four years the entire party is reorganized from the ground up. It's actually a pretty well created organizational system, the only people who really bitch about it are they keyboard warriors who have no understanding of it or the crazies who cannot fathom why they need other people to agree with them.

[–] Viking_Hippie 2 points 7 months ago

The DNC is a national political party organization

Nope, it's a private for-profit corporation masquerading as a political party.

That's how they're legally registered and that's how they were able to argue in court that they can rig the primaries or even just directly appointment nominees if they want to

Every four years the entire party is reorganized from the ground up

How adorably naive you are! 🥹

Biden and the rest of the leadership are part of a clique who took over the party in 1992 and never let go. Maybe some of the names and faces change, but the governing and campaign philosophies haven't changed since then and won't no matter how much the people they're supposed to represent do.

It's actually a pretty ~~well created organizational system~~ well-orchestrated political and financial machine

Fixed it for you

the only people who really bitch about it are ~~they keyboard warriors who have no understanding of it~~ people who understand how it ACTUALLY works and would prefer a more open, honest and representative party

the crazies who cannot fathom why they need other people to agree with them.

Yeah, because the Democratic Party operates based on pure consensus of the voters and never act against the will of the people for profit or to maintain the status quo.. 🙄

Are you being paid or are you gaslighting for free?

[–] return2ozma 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Reorganized from the ground up... to be exactly the same. They're not left.

This is Pelosi telling progressives and the left to F off... https://youtu.be/MR65ZhO6LGA

[–] Bernie_Sandals -1 points 7 months ago

Pelosi doesn't pick who can enter or who wins a primary, none of the Democratic leadership does. That's the donor class at best, but even they can get steamrolled over as the left should've learned with AOC and Crowley.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It’s so pathetic how you all try to convince us that the Dems are a fairly run grassroots organization when we all know that’s complete bullshit. The second there’s a real threat to the party leadership they can and will change the rules with zero options for recourse through the courts. They’ve done it multiple times before and they will do it again.

At this point I have to assume you have malicious intent towards leftist voters because this is just blatant gaslighting.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The Democratic Party and the DNC and all the affiliates are nothing more than tools for whatever vaguely left of american center interest group wants to use them.

There's no massive conspiracy to keep the Democrats Neoliberal, and if there is anything even similar to that, it's happening behind closed doors in Wall Street, not Washington.

They'll keep doing whatever they want without changing as long as people keep voting for him.

How long have you been involved in politics? I dont mean for that to sound demeaning. We've gone from Neoliberal democrats and Clinton gutting social welfare in the 90s to Socialists being integrated into the broader coalition, both parties have changed and will continue to change immensely over time. Ignoring that because you're upset about Bernie losing the primary in 2016 and 2020 and disconnecting completely from the party is just a ticket to irrelevance, and I say that as someone who worked on some of Bernie's first barnstorm events and both presidential campaigns.

[–] dariusj18 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's funny the way this thread went. I don't think people paid attention to how much the Democratic party changed after 2016 after the Bernie peeps found out about how the party is actually structured. But there ended up being 3 types of new grassroots activists.

  1. The ones that quickly found out that the DNC isn't some authoritarian regime who instead pulled up their seat at the table and effected change.
  2. The ones that quickly found out that the DNC isn't some authoritarian regime and who wouldn't compromise with anyone and quickly became irrelevant but still cried that the system was still rigged (while their compatriots looked on in disgust lamenting the extra power to affect change they would have if they would vote as a block).
  3. Those who got in and then tried to pull the ladder up to prevent themselves from losing their position the same way they accused others of doing.
[–] Bernie_Sandals 0 points 7 months ago

Completely agree, I really don't know why these people think the DNC is some massive evil force trying to crush the grassroots leftie activism.

I'm pasting this from one of my earlier comments, but I feel like it's incredibly relevant.

If you don't like the policies of the moderate Democrats then volunteer for your local party, most of the people running your county party are old as fuck, that's one of the main problems with the Dems. Vote in every single primary for the most progressive option. Donate to and volunteer for your progressive state representatives/senators. Help your coworkers organize a union and increase your lobbying power. Join a progressive/socialist election work group like Progressive Victory or any of the countless others. If you aren't doing at least one of these regularly, then you have no right to complain that the party isn't listening to you. You've given them no reason to.

I deeply feel that none of the people in this thread commenting about the malevolent DNC have done these, and kept doing them since the Bernie campaigns.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I love how democrats just throw out the word “conspiracy” whenever they’re trying to make rational ideas sound crazy.

There is no “conspiracy” to keep the dnc neoliberal. They do it right out in the fucking open and they couldn’t be more clear about it.

The current Dem leader in the house is an actual public school buster with direct ties to private school corporations yet we still have blatant shills like you trying to gaslight us into believing that the democrats aren’t intentionally pro-corporate neoliberals. That’s fucking hilarious.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 3 points 7 months ago

There is no “conspiracy” to keep the dnc neoliberal. They do it right out in the fucking open and they couldn’t be more clear about it.

That would still be a conspiracy, I never said it was a conspiracy theory. But if having Caucus leadership of a certain ideology makes the entire party that ideology, let's look at the largest democratic caucus and who leads it

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Progressive_Caucus

Well look at that, it's the largest caucus of the Democratic Party and its literally lead by a socialist. The entire democratic party must be socialist /s.

We are definitely trying to fight with capitalists over who "owns" the party right now, but walking away from the fight now and trying the same thing the CPUSA and SPA have been trying for a century would be stupid.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Nope, party flips have happened before and they will happen again. You sound extremely condescending for someone who doesn’t know nearly as much they think they do.

The Democratic Party is run by deeply monied interests. You well never succeed in “converting” it to socialism. and no, getting a handful of candidates like AOC elected over the course of a few decades doesn’t show that you can. It actually proves the opposite point.

Today’s Democratic Party is more conservative than ever so all of you claiming we can convert are either incredibly naive, or deliberately trying to sabotage leftist movements.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The Democratic Party is run by deeply monied interests.

You ever seen proof for this or did you just hear it and it sounded right?

Today’s Democratic Party is more conservative than ever so all of you claiming we can convert are either incredibly naive, or deliberately trying to sabotage leftist movements.

Lmfao the Democratic Party used to be the part of Slavery and Segregation, and then what do you know, one of those party flips you literally mentioned happened and they became the ones spearheading the fight for civil rights in Congress. I see no reason the same can't happen around capitalism.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And now they are the party of genocide. Hey! Maybe you're right!

[–] Bernie_Sandals 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Sure you can say that, but half the party supports a ceasefire, the entire republican party would glass gaza from orbit given a chance.

[–] Cryophilia 1 points 7 months ago

Today’s Democratic Party is more conservative than ever

Biden just called Trans people part of the fabric of our nation rofl what the fuck are you on about

Inb4 "well that doesn't count" lol