this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024

548 points (98.2% liked)

News

23257 readers

3663 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

548

Paris Olympics lifts intimacy ban for athletes and is stocking up on 300,000 condoms (www.cbsnews.com)

submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave to c/news

74 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The intimacy ban that had been in place for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics has been lifted for the 2024 Paris Olympics, and the Olympic village, where the athletes stay during the event, will be stocked with 300,000 condoms, Laurent Michaud, director of the village, told Sky News.

In an interview about the upcoming games, which will be held in the French capital from July 26 to Aug. 11, Michaud said they are preparing for 14,250 residents at the village and are aiming to have 300,000 condoms for the athletes.

Rules on intimacy went into effect for the 2020 Olympics that were held in Tokyo, Japan in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. To help prevent the virus from spreading, athletes were asked to limit their physical contact with each other, keeping about six and a half feet between them, except when necessary, like on the field.

Providing condoms at the Olympics has been a tradition since the 1988 Seoul Olympics, as an effort to raise awareness for HIV and AIDS, according to CBS Sports. In Tokyo, officials still handed out 150,000 condoms – even though the intimacy rules prevented any scenarios to use them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] OhmsLawn 19 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I'm thinking about the tier list.

"Sprinter? No lol. No thanks."

I'd have to guess there are socioeconomic groupings as well. The rowers probably have the upper hand there, along with anything involving firearms or horses.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

Nope. From what I've read even olympic athletes consider anyone good enough for the olympics as 'top tier'. And it only lasts a few weeks

[–] RGB3x3 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Wait, why firearms?

[–] OhmsLawn 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, it was a guess, based less on US socioeconomics, and more globally. In a lot of countries, shooting involves a lot of red tape that's easier to wade through with a boatload of money.

[–] RGB3x3 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh... I misread your comment and thought you were ranking them based on sexual performance based on their sport.

Like, rowers have great thighs and arms, so they're strong. Horse riders know how to... Ride. But you wouldn't want sprinters because their goal is to finish the quickest.

But then I was wondering what would make a shooter so good in bed.

Anyway, the way I read your comment gave me a good chuckle. "The Olympian Sexual Performance Tier List."

[–] OhmsLawn 2 points 7 months ago

Got it.

The idea was a sexual attractiveness tier list, and money plays a role there.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because of the implication.

[–] CosmicTurtle 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So these Olympians are in danger?!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Nah, dude, dude, think about it: she's in the middle of Paris at the Olympic Games with some dude she barely knows. You know, she looks around and what does she see? A guy with a gun and 300,000 condoms. "Ahh, there's nowhere for me to run. What am I gonna do, say 'no?'"

[–] moistclump 1 points 7 months ago

Sprinter? I hard know ‘er.