this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
134 points (68.2% liked)

196

16238 readers
2068 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (23 children)

If a leftist believes that a far right regime is the only place to get accurate information that can't be found elsewhere, and then promotes that far right regime's media, that person is not a leftist.

What are they? I don't know. But when we have a small amount of accounts of people who are not who they claim to be, and they all are spending hours per day promoting the exact same message, and occasionally responding to the wrong messages, coordination of some kind is happening.

These accounts who push borderline pro-hamas sentiments while using Qatari media to do so may not be state sponsored. It could just be some lone nutcase who just really agrees with Qatar's geopolitical goals.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (11 children)

when we have a small amount of accounts of people who are not who they claim to be,

you said yourself you can't prove this. it's a conspiracy theory.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (10 children)

I don't need to prove that people who are funneling ad revenue to far right authoritarian regimes who fund religious terrorism aren't leftists.

Their actions did that before I entered the equation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What in that statement is conjecture?

Everybody who clicks on a link to that website without an ad blocker just gave ad revenue to an explicitly anti-semitic government. Going without a VPN, and that government now has a really simple way of unmasking the identities of who visited, directly from Lemmy.

As leftists, we have to be pro Palestine while being anti Qatar and anti Hamas. Trusting what they tell us isn't leftist, nor intelligent and I think if you are being honest with yourself, you already know that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

leftists link corporate media of all kind. it doesn't impugn their politics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Most corporate media aren't the sister organizations of Hamas.

You know that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Most corporate media aren’t the sister organizations of Hamas.

but they take money from people just as shitty, like bayer and lockheed and the pentagon. there is no ethical consumption under capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What specific US based leftist media are you accusing of taking money from weapons manufacturing?

I have been specific in my accusations against a media company, it is only right that you should as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What specific US based leftist media are you accusing

none, but there is plenty of us corporate and state sponsored propaganda posted in these communities and i don't see accusations of shilling for the pentagon and cia being thrown around like the accusations of shilling for putin/trump

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If you can name a single account of a supposed leftist who is filling their day by posting state propaganda or pro-weapons manufacturing sources to leftist communities, than I will happily consider this to have merit.

From my perspective it seems like you are excusing authoritarian behavior under the guise that leftists do it for others and thus are obligated to do so for Hamas.

I think until you name and shame we can probably dismiss this specific point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

From my perspective it seems like you are excusing authoritarian behavior under the guise that leftists do it for others and thus are obligated to do so for Hamas.

i never suggested any obligation. i'm saying that it's unreasonable to disqualify factual reporting on the basis that you don't like the people that funded it. object to the framing, or even to the actors themselves, but the reporting of facts is done by all kinds of actors, and it's up to readers to understand biases in even factual reporting and come to their own conclusions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

how hard is this?

new york times

washington post

given how ubiquitos links to these war-hawking publications are, your objection to al jazeera can't be motivated by the fact that tehy are f unded by bad people. it must be something else.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)