this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
244 points (97.3% liked)

News

23600 readers
3788 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Southern California socialite was found guilty Friday of murder and other charges in the hit-and-run deaths of two young brothers in a crosswalk more than three years ago.

Authorities said Rebecca Grossman, wife of a prominent Los Angeles burn doctor, fatally struck Mark Iskander, 11, and brother Jacob, 8, while speeding behind a car driven by then-lover Scott Erickson, a former Los Angeles Dodgers pitcher.

The jury found Grossman guilty on all counts: Two felony counts each of second-degree murder and gross vehicular manslaughter, and one felony count of hit-and-run driving resulting in death. She faces 34 years to life in prison.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago (3 children)

And it took THREE YEARS for such a simple case?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

She and he can afford very good lawyers, and the state had to make the case watertight against her without damaging their upcoming case against him.

[–] MotoAsh 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, we know there's a reason for it. Maybe a justice system that needs a perfect case BEFORE holding rich people accountable... is not a good system.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I would rather it take a long time than too quickly sentence an innocent person.

[–] jpreston2005 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

man they sentencing innocent poor people left and right out here

[–] PunnyName 6 points 9 months ago

Yep, and often the wrong one.

[–] MotoAsh -3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That is a pathetic stupid false dichotomy. Why is it either a "justice" system that cannot hold the rich accountable, OR a system that murders innocents?

You are just making excuses for them. Stop it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

This is literally a story about her being held accountable. We can, and very nearly do, have one that doesn't do both.

[–] PunnyName 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] MotoAsh 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Handing power to adults and not immature children who happen to have gotten old. That'd be a real fucking stellar start. Then let's stop having Congressman be rich dipshits whos wallstreet portfolios out do the best wallstreet investors by tens of percentages.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Handing power to adults and not immature children who happen to have gotten old. That’d be a real fucking stellar start. Then let’s stop having Congressman be rich dipshits whos wallstreet portfolios out do the best wallstreet investors by tens of percentages.

Imagine typing this out and accusing other people of not acting like adults.

[–] MotoAsh 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Imagine thinking an immature insult is a valid comeback. You fucking goons are pathetic. Have fun watching your freedoms and life slip away, because you wanted to be cool instead of right. Fucking loser.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Imagine thinking an immature insult is a valid comeback.

It might not be valid (whatever that means). But holy shit is it obvious that I hit the nail right on the head.

[–] PunnyName 21 points 9 months ago

"Socialite" = rich person

Money makes court take more time.

[–] TurtleJoe 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's a case where a pedestrian was killed by a motorist in the US. It's lucky they even brought a case, much less got a conviction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s a case where a pedestrian was killed by a motorist in the US. It’s lucky they even brought a case, much less got a conviction.

I'd ask for evidence you have to back up the implicit claim that it's unlikely that someone would recklessly kill a person with a car and actually get charged for, but I know I would just receive downvotes and no actual evidence. This is lemmy, after all, and you're shitting on America. That's the only important thing.