this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
640 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19226 readers
2923 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Poayjay 52 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It was a ballot initiative for an amendment. It was presented directly to voters. It was written so that voters could understand it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

oof, maybe not meant to be a burn, but that was a burn for sure

[–] douglasg14b 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Not really, the average literacy rate in the U.S is ~7th grade. This isn't just words, this is the ability to comprehend, remember, and critically think about what is read. Which is on average that of a 12 year old...

Take 100 people and HALF of them are more literate than a educationally average 12 year old, the rest are LESS literate. That's half of your voters...

It's a sad state of the U.S.

[–] Mirshe 1 points 10 months ago

What is "what happens when you choose to economically disadvantage schooling because you're mad about desegregation and the institution of a federal department of education", Alex?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

So you would rather stuff that's being put up to a vote be worded in a way that ambiguous? You want people to be able to slip in random new laws because it's so difficult to read? How about it's not only super difficult to read, but it was alson7 pages long? That's how you'd rather vote?