this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
407 points (98.1% liked)

News

23644 readers
3904 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New York will expand its legal definition of rape to include various forms of nonconsensual sexual contact, under a bill signed into law by Gov. Kathy Hochul on Tuesday.

The state’s current limited definition was a factor in writer E. Jean Carroll’s sexual abuse and defamation case against former President Donald Trump. The jury in the federal civil trial rejected the writer’s claim last May that Trump had raped her in the 1990s, instead finding the former president responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse.

The current law defines rape as vaginal penetration by a penis. The new law broadens the definition to include nonconsensual anal, oral, and vaginal sexual contact. Highlighting Carroll’s case at a bill signing ceremony in Albany, the Democratic governor said the new definition will make it easier for rape victims to bring cases forward to prosecute perpetrators. The law will apply to sexual assaults committed on or after Sept. 1.

“The problem is, rape is very difficult to prosecute,” Hochul said. “Physical technicalities confuse jurors and humiliate survivors and create a legal gray area that defendants exploit.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 81 points 10 months ago (6 children)

The current law defines rape as vaginal penetration by a penis. The new law broadens the definition to include nonconsensual anal, oral, and vaginal sexual contact.

Would it be so hard to include penile in there as well.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

No, but men can't be victims of such things anyway, didn't you know? ^/s

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The OP isn't great. The actual law is fairly clear that men are included.

This is copied from a reply I made further down, about the actual law:

Important to also not this:

  1. (a) "Oral sexual [~~conduct~~] contact " means conduct between persons consisting of contact between the mouth and the penis, the mouth and the anus, or the mouth and the vulva or vagina.

It does include raping a man orally explicitly in this. No hand stuff is included for anyone. The OP had poor wording, but the law seems fine. Maybe it should be expanded to using hands and other things to rape as well, but it doesn't exclude men. The way the law is written, it isn't rape to penetrate anyone with a dildo, for example. Also, a woman can't rape a woman except for orally in this law.

It has some oversight, but the oversight is not men, it's just certain methods.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Uhh so where’s the part about a vagina going over a penis?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

§2.1 Vaginal Sexual Contact. It's contact between a penis and vagina or vulva. There's no directionality to it. It's only about consent that defines who raped whom. If a woman forces contact between a penis and her vagina or vulva, she raped him with vaginal sexual contact.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It did, as the law was simply broadened to include more information ... not wiped clean to only have the new information.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Their point is that the broadened law does not appear to clearly and obviously cover men being raped by women.

For instance, is it rape under this new law for a woman to forcibly use her hand to jerk off a man without his consent? If not, then shouldn't it be?

Shouldn't the law state that forcible and nonconsensual contact with a penis is a crime?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a copy of the new law to prove it doesn't say anything about non-consensual contact?

[–] ninja 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Appreciate that. Thanks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No. But it is also not rape under this law for a man to forcibly use his hand to jerk off a woman.

If a woman makes non consensual contact with a mans penis using her vagina, mouth, or anus, that is rape under this law.

Perhaps the law should cover it. But the absense of hand-genital contact in the law is gender neutral.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But it is also not rape under this law for a man to forcibly use his hand to jerk off a woman.

From the top comment of this thread:

The new law broadens the definition to include nonconsensual anal, oral, and vaginal sexual contact.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

From the bill (track changes removed):

"Vaginal sexual contact" means conduct between persons consisting of contact between the penis and the vagina or vulva

https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2023/S3161

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Important to also not this:

  1. (a) "Oral sexual [~~conduct~~] contact " means conduct between persons consisting of contact between the mouth and the penis, the mouth and the anus, or the mouth and the vulva or vagina.

It does include raping a man orally explicitly in this. No hand stuff is included for anyone. The OP had poor wording, but the law seems fine. Maybe it should be expanded to using hands and other things to rape as well, but it doesn't exclude men. The way the law is written, it isn't rape to penetrate anyone with a dildo, for example. Also, a woman can't rape a woman except for orally in this law.

It has some oversight, but the oversight is not men, it's just certain methods.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Lol they bent the meaning of words to avoid making rape rape

Of course they did

[–] LowtierComputer -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Docking and urethrae insertion are a thing, but penetration is clearly not the sole definer because this change is about sexual contact.

[–] LowtierComputer 1 points 10 months ago

Ah. I see what you're saying.