this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
953 points (94.4% liked)

Memes

45871 readers
1053 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s not like any candidate was actually good but they did pick the worst one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NatakuNox 70 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Lol pick a candidate that is likely going to be in prison come election time! Geniuses!

[–] [email protected] 59 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Zero chance he is in prison by election day.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago

A man's gotta have a dream

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

At this point the only things between Trump and a jail cell are:

  1. The courts must rule in the coming days (probably this month, Jan 2024) that Presidents are subject to criminal prosecution. We know Presidents are not subject to civil prosecution, but the courts are deciding about criminal prosecution now. (Trump argues it would be "bedlam" if Presidents were subject to the law).

  2. A jury decision in mid 2024. If that jury says "guilty", it's over, Trump is a convicted felon.

[–] Anticorp 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Oh, you mean the court that trump himself stacked in favor of the GOP? The same court that has voted along party lines in like 98% of their rulings? Impartial my ass!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The immunity appeal that I’m referring to in #1 has 3 judges, none of which were appointed by Trump. (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/appeals-court-weighs-trumps-immunity-claim-election-interference-case-rcna132281)

The case I’m referring to in #2 has a judge that was not appointed by Trump. (Tanya Chutkan)

Case #1 might eventually be considered by the Supreme Court though, and your criticism would apply there.

Also, Trump's trial over mishandling classified documents is overseen by Judge Cannon, who Trump appointed, which is a sham. Cannon should have recused herself.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do you honestly believe there won't be any stalling or controversy between now and mid-year that won't delay it any further?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't know. Once the courts rule he can be prosecuted, and the trial date is already set, I don't know what other argument can be made to stall.

[–] Anticorp 1 points 11 months ago

They don't need a ruling to set a trial date. He isn't the president anymore. He can be tried. The fact that they're not is a symptom of a greater evil in our system.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Trump may or may not eventually end up in prison, but it's naïve after the past 8 years to assume that there are only two ways this could all shake out, and that you can predict them.

A possibility that will almost certainly be less absurd than whatever actually happens:

Trump wins a second term, manages to get the FedSoc 6 to rule that a sitting president can't be imprisoned because it would violate separation of powers. So multiple states are just waiting for his term to end so they can actually arrest him. (Feds can't arrest him because he has pardoned himself for all past, present, and future crimes)

Then in the last month of his presidency he takes a diplomatic trip to Russia and just never comes back.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I don't mean there are 2 ways this can shake out. I mean there are 2 legal barriers in the way. Once the courts rule that Trump can be prosecuted, then the trial date is set for spring. The judge is motivated to hold to that trial date. The prosecutors have their evidence and arguments ready for the jury.

On the possibility of Trump pardoning himself, it's not clear that a President can pardon himself and the supreme court would probably end up having to rule on that.

If Trump is a convicted felon, then he probably can't get enough votes to win, but I don't know, the cult is strong with this one.

[–] Wogi 1 points 11 months ago

Which means he can't vote for himself.

Convicted felons can be president.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Most of the people I know who plan to vote for him think of that as a good thing. It's the whole "drain the swamp" thing that he's been rallying people behind for years; they think bad actors in the government are trying to hold Trump down, and him being in jail is just another attempt to do that - from their perspective, electing him even while he's imprisoned would be a big "fuck you" to those bad actors.

It's sad that they can't see that Trump himself is the bad actor, but to most of them, Trump is their last hope to hold on to their beloved world of racism and misogyny, free of any "woke bullshit." They'll overlook anything he says or does at this point, since they don't see any other way forward than through Trump.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I just don't understand the appeal. Forget all of the gross shit he's done over the years, the terrible and fraudulent business he's conducted, he's just gross period. Like standing there, sounding like a rambling lunatic, not finishing sentences, $10 spray tan, and ill fitting suit. How does that track as "wow what an amazing businessman!"

[–] LemmysMum 1 points 11 months ago

Representatives gonna represent.

[–] Anticorp 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah right. If he wins, he's free. Shame on the justice department for not completing a single trial in FOUR FUCKING YEARS. Have they even started any of them? No way any of them are wrapped up before the election. The wheels of justice turn slowly. Yeah, yadda yadda yadda. They're barely turning at all against this fat fucking loser.

[–] Mirshe 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

His lawyers have run out pretty much every option to delay trials, although several judges have seemed pretty damn complicit as well. I get wanting to make sure the case is as airtight as possible, but...the people they're worried about pissing off with a case that isn't entirely formed, were just going to be pissed off anyway.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Judge Cannon seems pretty ok to impede any progress she possibly can.

[–] riodoro1 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

There is almost no chance they are gonna lock him up. He could openly murder someone with his own hands, on stage, and he would still be able to run in the elections.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately, I think you're probably right. We keep seeing it over and over again. The judicial system continues to move slowly with as many delays and roadblocks as possible. When judgements are made, they are stayed during an appeal so they have no teeth. The farce of the Supreme Court will never let anything bad happen to their dear leader. They will delay, delay, delay until Trump is either reelected - in which case he'll pardon himself. Or until a new president is elected in 2028. If it's a Republican, they'll pardon Trump on day 1. If it's a Democrat, the Republicans in Congress will find some way to force a presidential pardon in order to keep the government funded or some other bullshit.

I think there's a 0% chance Trump ever sees a single day in prison. Even if none of what I said above happens, he'd get a slap on the wrist at worst. I would LOVE to be proven wrong. But I'm not holding my breath.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Haven’t you heard? He’s the second coming of Christ and his cross is the US legal system.

I really wish I was kidding.

e: link

[–] FlashMobOfOne 5 points 11 months ago

After decades of headlines like the one you just posted absolutely nothing has happened.

Trump is bulletproof and he knows it, and now, he doesn't have to lie about how shitty his opponent in the race is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I heard that mentioned on MSNBC, 30% of the people who caucused for him say that they would not vote for him if he was convicted.

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy 11 points 11 months ago

30% of the people who caucused for him are liars

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

You fucking jinxed it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Trying to prosecute him for his real crimes is honestly damaging the election chances of Biden, lots of voters with a vicarious persecution complex through Trump.