this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
549 points (88.9% liked)

Political Memes

5598 readers
1831 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m the chimney sweep now!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

we just moved child labour to less developed countries. we didn't get rid of anything. you just don't see it, but child labour is still going strong in the world. child slavery as well.

[–] RaoulDook 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

No WE did not. The people in those countries where it still happens allowed it to still happen.

None of us have any decisionmaking power to control what those countries do, so the burden to fix those problems is on those countries who allow it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's 100% a consequence of Capitalism, though. You're blaming developing nations for the willful exploitation international Corporations commit and you personally benefit from.

[–] RaoulDook 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

That's just your opinion. The fact is that those developing nations should have child labor laws in place, and proper enforcement of those laws to prevent children from being exploited. The blame belongs squarely on those who allow it, and I reject any personal responsibility for any of that because I have no control over the laws of any country.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are you 14? You don't seem to understand how global trade works

[–] RaoulDook 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm a bit older than that and have actually studied Macroeconomics at the undergraduate level. Have you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Because a macroeconomics course is obviously going to be honest about this topic... Are you even serious?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is not my opinion that international corporations brutally exploit the third world, it's a fact. It is also not my opinion that Capitalism leads to this, the profit motive inevitably leads to it.

You claiming that developing nations should just fight against international corporations brutally exploiting them and absolving yourself of any responsibility you have for it is just sticking your head in the sand. If you aren't boycotting Nestlé, you're supporting them.

The "good" news is that there is no ethical consumption under Capitalism. You individually cannot do much, except protect, organize, and try your best to support less unethical companies whenever you can. However, to blame developing countries for corporations knowingly brutally exploiting them and offering no alternative is absolutely baffling.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The "good" news is that there is no ethical consumption under Capitalism.

Such an absurd thing to say. I’m sure you’ll win lots of hearts and minds with your absolutist take 🙄

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What a way to say absolutely nothing.

If Capitalism is inherently exploitative, then there is no perfectly ethical form of it. Therefore, it should be replaced with a better system.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do you imagine there is a switch somewhere? Like, right now we’re “doing capitalism” and tomorrow we could flip the switch and do something else?

Everything exists on a spectrum, and you won’t find anything like “pure” capitalism anywhere.

Id also disagree with the premise of it being inherently exploitative, but that’s a different topic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

No, I don't think you can just turn on the Socialism, Communism, or Anarchism button and do those. That's Utopianism. However, the idea that radical restructuring of society must be done via painfully slow iterative changes is also absurd and Utopian.

Capitalism is inherently exploitative, and that isn't a different topic. Complaining about me saying that there's no ethical consumption under Capitalism and yet saying you don't want to talk about why that's the case is just running away.

Capitalism is a bunch of mini-dictators competing, when we could have democratic and Cooperative control of industry instead.

[–] Psychodelic 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Seriously! I mean, what if we only exploit a little bit of others' labor? Isn't that ok?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Sure, and when nobody wants to be a farmer in your utopia, you aren’t going to “exploit” anybody to fix that problem right?

[–] SCB 0 points 11 months ago

I'm not exploiting you if we agree on a price for something.

[–] Psychodelic -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We get it, you're white.. relax

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Interesting take to assume developed = white and developing = not white.

[–] Psychodelic 1 points 11 months ago

I was referring to the rejecting any personal responsibility spiel. lol. I love how far off you were though

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Yeah those countries just need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and start being productive members of the world.

I know we could help them out so they don't have to go through all the hard times alone and without the knowledge we have, but fuck em hahahahahaha

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But we are sharing knowledge and sending both aid and capital there. A lot of the countries are industrialized to the degree they are with the capital. Nobody acts in a vacuum these days.

We could be doing more for sure but we're not doing nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

That literally has nothing to do with what I was making fun of that guy for. He was arguing we shouldn't help at all. I was being sarcastic with him.

I agree with what you've said

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

It's a very complex issue, Western countries do a lot of things to help out less developed nations but we also do selfish things that makes life harder for them - unfortunately this is the reality of humanity, I am fighting my own personal ideological war against capitalism and the greed based system by which we live so I'm not defending it but it also has to be stated that other systems can have these flaws too.

We need a cultural shift to fix these problems, an economic one isn't enough on its own

[–] RaoulDook -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The fact is that those developing nations should have child labor laws in place, and proper enforcement of those laws to prevent children from being exploited. The blame belongs squarely on those who allow it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What a strange take. You’re saying that if I, as a business owner, am fully aware that my production chain relies on slave or child labor in another country, I bear no moral responsibility because “well that country should have stopped it”?

[–] RaoulDook 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I didn't say any of that bullshit that you're trying to imply that I said. Those are your words only.

Comments like yours are a detriment to social media. Don't try to put words in people's mouths. That garbage is far too common and you just dumped yours here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

That’s precisely what you said, it’s nobody’s responsibility but that country. I merely pointed out an obvious example where your statement is false. Work on your comprehension skills.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Uh huh, I bet you definitely have bought something that is connected to child labor. Now, STFU, fool.

For the record, if you're in the U.S., there are plenty of children being exploited right here.

[–] RaoulDook -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No you can shut the fuck up. You are getting a block shortly after you read this. You know it costs nothing to be polite instead of throwing around insults to people you disagree with.

Don't be a piece of shit. It's not that hard.

[–] Psychodelic -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How dare someone point out things I'm ignorant of and don't understand as I make ridiculous claims about economic/foreign policy! Ohers have no right to criticize my unfounded, poorly-thought-out statements!!

Seriously though, you're totally not a fool. Imperialism and colonization are just buzzwords; they don't actually mean anything, so you have nothing to worry about

[–] RaoulDook -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Funny how nobody wants to address the actual facts that I stated, that the burden of enforcing child labor laws is on the country that it happens in.

It doesn't fucking matter at all though, because nobody reading any of this can do any goddamn thing about it, and it will continue regardless.

Enjoy your dose of realism for today.

[–] Psychodelic 0 points 11 months ago

Colonization isn't real

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

yes we do. we demand money and offer that the only way they can make it is by exploitation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not sure who the "we" in this situation is, but I'm not demanding anything from them. They're selling shit and I'm buying. I'm not demanding products from them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m buying

consumers are responsible for what they consume. pay and forget doesn't work

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You said "we demand money", that's what I'm replying to. I (nor you in the comment I was replying to) didn't say anything about responsibility.

[–] SCB 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

we demand money and offer that the only way they can make it is by exploitation.

This is the opposite of outsourcing labor.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

lets say america finds the cure for cancer, they only accept dollars. you have to get those dollars. welcome to the global trade.

[–] SCB 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

None of this has anything to do with outsourcing labor other than that you'll have way more dollars than if you were a subsistence farmer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

outsourcing labor

if americans are using their time to find the cure for cancer someone has to produce food, someone has to mine the copper, someone has to etc... exploitation, the outsourcing of exploitation is a given in a capitalist system. if you are a subsistence farmer no cure for cancer for you in a capitalist system.

[–] SCB 1 points 11 months ago

Pretty hard to export child chimney sweeps to other countries