this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
549 points (88.9% liked)

Political Memes

5598 readers
2162 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m the chimney sweep now!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is not my opinion that international corporations brutally exploit the third world, it's a fact. It is also not my opinion that Capitalism leads to this, the profit motive inevitably leads to it.

You claiming that developing nations should just fight against international corporations brutally exploiting them and absolving yourself of any responsibility you have for it is just sticking your head in the sand. If you aren't boycotting Nestlé, you're supporting them.

The "good" news is that there is no ethical consumption under Capitalism. You individually cannot do much, except protect, organize, and try your best to support less unethical companies whenever you can. However, to blame developing countries for corporations knowingly brutally exploiting them and offering no alternative is absolutely baffling.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The "good" news is that there is no ethical consumption under Capitalism.

Such an absurd thing to say. I’m sure you’ll win lots of hearts and minds with your absolutist take 🙄

[–] Psychodelic 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Seriously! I mean, what if we only exploit a little bit of others' labor? Isn't that ok?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Sure, and when nobody wants to be a farmer in your utopia, you aren’t going to “exploit” anybody to fix that problem right?

[–] SCB 0 points 11 months ago

I'm not exploiting you if we agree on a price for something.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What a way to say absolutely nothing.

If Capitalism is inherently exploitative, then there is no perfectly ethical form of it. Therefore, it should be replaced with a better system.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do you imagine there is a switch somewhere? Like, right now we’re “doing capitalism” and tomorrow we could flip the switch and do something else?

Everything exists on a spectrum, and you won’t find anything like “pure” capitalism anywhere.

Id also disagree with the premise of it being inherently exploitative, but that’s a different topic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

No, I don't think you can just turn on the Socialism, Communism, or Anarchism button and do those. That's Utopianism. However, the idea that radical restructuring of society must be done via painfully slow iterative changes is also absurd and Utopian.

Capitalism is inherently exploitative, and that isn't a different topic. Complaining about me saying that there's no ethical consumption under Capitalism and yet saying you don't want to talk about why that's the case is just running away.

Capitalism is a bunch of mini-dictators competing, when we could have democratic and Cooperative control of industry instead.