this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

15525 readers
189 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: [email protected] or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
40
Prusa MK4 vs Bambu P1S (self.3dprinting)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by root to c/3dprinting
 

I'm looking to buy an intermediate level printer to upgrade from a MK2, and I'm deciding between a P1S vs a MK4.

I have never considered getting anything other than a Prusa, since I've had such good experiences using mine, however I heard that recently they've switched away from their open source model(?)

That and being made in the EU was the main differentiating factor for me, however I do hear really good things about Bambu printers.

Does anyone have experience with either?

Edit: Found a lot of the information I was looking for here: https://lemmy.world/post/9500502

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PlasticExistence 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah, that explains it. Doesn't it seem weird to you that they would design it that way with such an obvious flaw?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

TBH I’m not a huge fan of using the nozzle for probing, but I wouldn’t call it a flaw. It works pretty well as long as the nozzle is clean.

[–] PlasticExistence 1 points 10 months ago

Well I mean, if it's leaving material behind that affects the first layer I would call that flawed. If not, then no biggie.