this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
301 points (94.1% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2310 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) said in an interview that aired Sunday that he believed opening up to the public about his mental health struggles earlier this year would negatively impact his career.

In an interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker on “Meet the Press,” Fetterman opened up about his battle with clinical depression earlier this year and urged those facing mental health issues to seek help. He said that for the first couple of weeks while being treated for depression at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, he felt scared about sharing his experiences publicly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ghostalmedia 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Meh, I can disagree with him about things like Israel-Palestine foreign policy and still agree with him about other important stuff. No human is going to have the exact same views that I have.

I agree with his pushes for universal healthcare and destigmatizing incredibly common mental health diagnoses.

Statistically speaking, a lot more people in elected office suffer from depression, anxiety, or something else, but no one else talks about it.

[–] RealFknNito 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This isn't like, disagreeing on gun control. He wore the fucking Israel flag like a cape while reports are coming out that they're dropping JDAMs on children. I don't care what his struggles are, he's advocating for something so transparently heinous that his 'temperate' views are worthless.

I don't care how good Graduation was by Kanye, he's racist. I don't care how good Hitler's paintings are, he started a holocaust. There's "polite disagreement" and "advocating for war crimes".

[–] theparadox 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's more than Israel. He's either taken the left for a ride or he's decided he's gotten what he needed and doesn't need to side with progressives anymore on a number of issues. https://nypost.com/2023/12/15/news/fetterman-insists-hes-not-a-progressive-despite-frequently-calling-himself-one/

[–] WindyRebel 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can disagree with him about things like Israel-Palestine foreign policy and still agree with him about other important stuff. No human is going to have the exact same views that I have.

Thank you! Good gravy, when will people finally get this through their thick skulls? Politics and beliefs are not, and never will be, an all or nothing thing.

[–] RealFknNito 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Alright then you wouldn't mind a little piss in your cereal, yeah? The whole bowl isn't piss, it's just a little bit. Cereal will never be an all or nothing thing so take a fucking bite.

Or can a little bit of something be so revolting you get rid of it all? Fucking hell.

[–] WindyRebel 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude. You need to live in reality. You think all voters believe in and advocate for the same things?

No one wants piss in their cereal, but guess what? You’ll get it anyway. Just vote for how much.

[–] RealFknNito 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've always been voting for the least pissed in cereal but the difference is you're telling me it's fine and I'm telling you it's not fine.

Submitting to the idea that there will always be piss in your cereal is a dark reality I refuse to accept.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem with your analogy is for you it’s piss, but a reasonable person who’s actually fairly close to you ideologically can come to a different conclusion. But you both like cereal, and maybe that’s more important.

[–] RealFknNito 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a genocide and he's supporting it. Yes, the analogy isn't perfect but trying to pick it apart now is just semantics. He is defending the indefensible and by doing so joins the fascists and zionists who want nothing more than Palestine to be glassed to make way for Jewish settlers. This isn't a game of Civilization, I don't give a shit if Hamas gave them a Casus Belli, this is genocide and it's sickening.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The slaughter of children is worse than piss in my cereal. Why is it not worse for you?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they call that a straw man.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Actually they call it the current situation in gaza