this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
289 points (97.7% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
2401 readers
877 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He's not wrong per say, it's just that the level of danger increases or decreases depending on whose tail gets stepped on.
He's not wrong per "say", if the goal is to maximize the negative impact of COVID on population health.
I rather believe the goal is to maximize the negative effects of the COVID vaccines as per his interests.
That doesn’t even make sense you fucking idiot. His goal by trying to get people to stop getting the vax is to maximize the negative effects of the vax?
How the fuck would stopping people from getting it maximize the damage done by those that get it?
It’s a miracle you even manage to draw breath you fucking imbecile
He is wrong. Entirely wrong about everything. There is zero truth or accuracy to any statement made by the Surgeon General of Florida.
Ok.
You say that, but it feels like you don't believe me.
I believe you are mostly correct. The vaccines are generally safe and his intentions are not for the general public's interest. But, just like his special case exists, so do the circumstances in which the vaccines can be dangerous.
Blindly saying he is completely wrong about everything when we can't know that for sure is in itself wrong because we can't be absolutely sure that he is, even though he may be.
I think the word applied here is "semantics".
He is wrong. There is no statistically significant risk of cancer from the vaccine vs any other thing youd be exposed to especially living in Florida.
Alright.
He is wrong per se.
But not per say. Spinning the tale to fit his view doesn't have to be completely correct, it just has to be not wrong.
And the title isn't wrong, the vaccines aren't safe, they're safe enough. As in the side effects are negligible. Spinning words, it's the political way.
It’s per se, you fucking moron
Additionally, the occurrence of side effects does not make something unsafe. How fucking stupid can you be
They are safe.
Conditionally.
They are safe.
Conditionally.
They are safe.
Conditionally.
What are the conditions under which they are not safe?
When placed in idle hands.