this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
328 points (96.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Candelestine 35 points 11 months ago (6 children)

tbf, I wouldn't be surprised if he never has actually read an entire book. You don't necessarily need to have read an original source to parrot some of its contents, there's plenty of other ways.

[–] grue 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

As fun as it is to dunk on how stupid and demented Trump is, it also serves to downplay the threat he poses and is thus unhelpful at best or disinformation at worst.

I also feel obligated to point out that he wasn't always as addled and incoherent as he is now -- if you go back and watch old interviews from the '80s or whatever, he was, in fact, capable of stringing thoughts together at least.

Now please stop making me appear to defend traitorous assholes!

[–] BackOnMyBS 8 points 11 months ago

watch old interviews from the '80s

I don't know if I'm just easily triggered because of personal experiences, but I don't understand how anyone can look at him speak and not recognized his unhealthy grandiosity. That guy is not mentally okay and should not be in charge of anything.

[–] Candelestine 6 points 11 months ago

Not even his intelligence, that's the personality of someone who cheated their way through anything that might've involved assigned reading.

I think we all know there's a lot of ways to get out of assigned reading, and it is not a rare phenomenon.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

A lot of this probably comes from his advisors. But i imagine those advisors would follow him back into the whitehouse

[–] Candelestine 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He's got some new ones lined up too apparently. I'm sure they're all "wonderful people".

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"I only hire the best people!"

[Proceeds to be the president that fired the most high ranking staff he appointed himself]

[–] Viking_Hippie 7 points 11 months ago

Yeah, Stephen Miller is still one of his most trusted advisors and sometimes speech writer and you KNOW that creep loves himself some Hitler!

Personally I think the Hitler influence is coming from Trump himself AND Stephen Miller. Probably other advisors too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Didn't he supposedly keep a copy of it by his bed at some point? Seems like a weird book to just keep around for decor. Whether he ever finished it is a separate issue, but I think it's fair to assume he's at least read parts of it.

[–] grue 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It was My New Order (a book of Hitler's collected speeches) that he supposedly kept by his bed. That's a separate story from his admission that a friend gave him a copy of Mein Kampf.

In other words, Trump is apparently such a fanboi that he owned multiple books by Hitler!

[–] agent_flounder 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah it says that thing about the speeches in the article.

But gee, I mean he isn't waving a Nazi flag and he doesn't have a toothbrush stache and saying "I totally love Hitler and I am a diehard Nazi" so I, I just don't know if we have enough evidence to draw a conclusion yet.

/S if it wasn't obvious.

[–] 800XL 5 points 11 months ago

Replace Mein Kampf with the bible and it still stands! Drink Bleach and his cult have read neither!

[–] paddirn 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure he hadn't read any part of it, maybe not even the title, but it is a good indicator of the people he associates with, which says something about him. Nobody just gifts you a copy of 'Mein Kampf' for shits and giggles, it's not something you just read for fun. While I'm sure plenty of people have read it just to see it for themselves and they're not actually racists (the same way somebody can read a religious text without being religious), BUT it's not something you just gift to somebody without trying to suggest some ideas to them.

[–] SCB 3 points 11 months ago

Worth noting that, hilariously, no one gave him a copy of Mein Kampf. The person gave him a book on Hitler's speeches, and Trump remembers this as his "Jewish friend giving him "Mein Kampf" because he's a fucking idiot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Stephen Miller probably read the picture book version to him at beddy-beddy-bed time.