politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Once again. You're turning this into a binary choice that does not exist. In any case, you're also acting like the American Rescue Plan was Biden's work alone. It was far from it, and those provisions you're touting? First pushed for- and won by... that's right ... progressives. He's also done this at a time when he had full control of the house and senate. the biggest argument people make for Biden is his vast experience working across the aisle. Most of the heavy heavy lifting was done by Pelosi, Shumer and Sanders. But go ahead, give credit to BIden and only Biden on that.
ONCE AGAIN. this isn't about republicans. I'll try not to bring that up again. No promises. In any case the clean energy spending is tax incentives and funding for things people (mostly corporations) were going to do anyhow. Or do you think corporations aren't looking at climate change and making plans? Further aspects of the IRA are hilarious the 15% minimum corpo tax for mega-corps? yeah. Corporate tax rate is supposed to be 21% since 2017... ask yourself how exactly a 15% minimum tax when the tax is supposed to be 21% is going to net more money? particularly when tax enforcement in these sectors is... insanely pathetic.
Oh, and Biden didn't do nearly as much of the heavy lifting, and if you want to give Biden credit, lets give him some blame too, considering that it almost didn't pass with Manchin and Sinema being party hold outs.
to the benefit of corporations. Oh, and you some how managed to make this about republicans again. It's no secret the US is behind on infrastructure spending. should I applaud and celebrate the fast food line cook who manages to make my order adequately? Nope. compensation was already given for that. You'll notice, also, that this push for infrastructure started with... progressives. and made possible with their heavy lifting.
Pure political showmanship.
He also shat over the rail unions when they were asking for things like sick leave and shit. He could have just as easily used his authority to force the corporations to give labor what they wanted. Which is hilarious, because honestly... it's not like labor was asking for anything that wasn't just part of good business strategies or, you know... something that'll help keep trains from derailing... but nope. he forced the Union to take a shittier deal. (Yeah, they more or less got what they wanted later, but that was after the negotiations were done.)
I do. But the NLRB is an independent agency. The best that could be said about that is that Biden had the opportunity to appoint 2 members to the current board. It's difficult to say whether better or worse appointments could have been made by another. As it stands, it was with a senate that was able to rubber stamp the democratic nominations. funny how that works.
Again, the FTC is an independent agency. and again. it's difficult to argue that another democratic president would not have appointed the same person. There is a lot of people who start that process before the president even considers a name.
Yeah. I like her. she's awesome. This was partly the result of Biden actually honoring a campaign promise to... oh, that's right... progressives who wanted a more diverse set of backgrounds on SCOTUS.
You just have to keep circling back to that, don't you?
Just because Biden is less-supportive than republicans doesn't mean he's not on the wrong side of history there. Oh, and by the way, did you see the headline where we're expediting arms shipments?
Yet, half of your arguments in this entire comment relate Biden to being better than trump. Which leads us to back to: there are millions of eligible Americans who are also not-trump. this is a very bad argument to be making.... and lets be honest here... the reason people are trying to primary Biden isn't because they're disloyal so much as biden is fucking weak and they see blood in the water.
It's about how unpopular Biden is with voters. the people who don't like Biden, dislike trump even more. it's really that simple. you can ignore the lions share of the progressive voters all you want, it's not going to end well. if you truly don't want Trump to succeed... then you should be down with considering who is the best candidate to defeat him, and nothing you have said is all that convincing that it is in fact Biden.
Domestically, the economy objectively sucks for the vast majority of Americans... trying to convince people how great the economy is, when there's record numbers of homelessness, and more Americans living paycheck to paycheck, people are struggling. but we're supposed to feel good because corporations are having record years? Fuck off.
foreign policy, he fucked the pooch with Israel. there's no way around that. he vowed unequivocal, and enduring support to a government that was plotting genocide. I don't have any good answers, but supporting Israel is not it. (as I've been saying since october... neither Hamas nor Israel are the good guys. they're both perpetrators. Civilians are the real victims here... on both sides.)
Well, maybe it's not a binary choice, but it is certainly a choice that does exist.
Well...yes...with the implication that Biden's unpopularity is a boon for his political opposition. Maybe not Trump per se, but certainly Biden v Republicans.
I thought you said it wasn't about this...
Anyway...by sheer political inertia, Biden has an institutional advantage against any Republican contender. Like...before we argue about anything, Biden's chances of winning are better simply by default. You have the burden of proving that he's so weak as a candidate that even that advantage is gone. No one ever makes that argument, they just assert it as true. But I'm not convinced it is.
The weird thing is that this isn't Biden's fault...well...not entirely his fault. A podcast I listen to every now and then said that this is the era of business, and I'm inclined to agree. American Free Enterprise is all about value extraction, and they've been so successful that Trump sells pieces of his suit at $5000 a piece to fools and it's totally okay. Business values have effectively superseded political values, and there's a lot of people responsible for that.
I don't disagree with anything else you said.