this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023

591 points (98.0% liked)

News

23684 readers

3957 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

591

Race played role in sentencing of Black child, 10, for urinating in public, lawyer says (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave to c/news

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The lawyer said he’s baffled that prosecutors pursued the case and that a youth judge oversaw a sentence that included probation and requiring the child to write a report about Kobe Bryant.

A 10-year-old Black child in Mississippi who urinated in public in August was sentenced Tuesday in youth court to three months' probation, a decision the child’s attorney says was influenced by race.

Quantavious Eason, who is in the third grade, was arrested by Senatobia police Aug. 10 after a police officer saw him relieving himself outside next to his mom’s car when the woman was inside an attorney’s office, according to family attorney Carlos Moore.

Given the circumstances, any child would have done the same thing, Moore said. He noted there was no public restroom at the attorney’s office.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The thing that sticks out to me, that no one seems to be talking about, is this:

"...this week oversaw a sentence that included probation and requiring Quantavious to write a two-page report about Kobe Bryant."

He's charged with urinating outside. Already stupid and ridiculous. But then the judge assigns homework, which... What? And then it's about Kobe Bryant which has what to do with urinating outside? Why Kobe Bryant?? Is there a public urination charge in his past I don't know about? Did the judge ask "who's your favorite person?" and assign homework based on that?

It's a dumb thing to be concerned about, but it's somehow even weirder to me than the rest of it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Read in white news lady voice:

Quantavious Eason, the urban youth convicted in the case, is alleged by police to have yelled "I'm the Kobe Bryant of public urination" while urinating in front of the officers near his mother's car.

Judge Smith, who oversaw the case, assigned Quantavious probabtion, and ordered him to write a two-page essay on Kobe Bryant, asking the boy:

court recording plays

Judge: WHAT is WRONG with you?

Quantavious: ^N-nothin^ ^I^ ^just^ ^really^ ^needed^ ^to^ ^pee...^

Judge: Are you aware of Kobe Bryant's dominance in the sport of basketball?

Quantavious: ^Ummm...^ ^Y-yes^ ^sir^ ^he's^ ^the^ ^g-goat^

Judge: Do you really think your pitiful little pee pee you did by your momma's car puts you in the same league as Kobe? May he rest in peace...

Court: murmurs

Judge: Young man, you need to reflect on what you've done and take that stank off Kobe's name.

Quantavious: ^But^ ^I^ ^didn't^ ^even^ ^s-say^ ^that^ ^stuff^ ^though...^

Judge: Is that back-talk? Alright. Probabtion. slams gavel

Quantavious: ^Sir^ ^I'm^ ^10^ ^years^ ^old...^

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Anybody here ever heard a 10-year- old use the term "public urination"?

Anyone?

[–] khannie 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Judge: WHAT is WRONG with you?

What the actual fuck? That is someone completely devoid of empathy.

Edit: ok I see now this is not an actual conversation that happened. Lol.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that it could've happened is, in itself, a testament to the fact that we live in one of the societies of all time

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The United States is definitely a country that exists and does things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sadly it also doesn't do enough things.

[–] Agrivar 1 points 1 year ago

But also sadly, it does some things far too much.

[–] JustZ 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just think the article doesn't give enough detail. At the same time, I also don't think it matters really what the person writes about as long as it's some sort of topic that has to do with being a good community member.

Perhaps the urge is to make the person write about why they shouldn't do the crime again (not that this should have been a criminal matter), and the instinct is to make the person feel ashamed about their antisocial behavior. Better to build a relationship to a positive role model in the community than to label the person as shameful, imo.