this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
36 points (97.4% liked)
Canada
7411 readers
402 users here now
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
๐ Meta
๐บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
๐๏ธ Cities / Local Communities
- Calgary (AB)
- Edmonton (AB)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
๐ Sports
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- Montrรฉal Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
๐ป Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
๐ต Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Buy Canadian
- Quebec Finance
- Churning Canada
๐ฃ๏ธ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
๐ Social / Culture
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Google?
Nope the money is going from Google into the pockets of Canadian Telco companies.
It's actually a good point as companies like Bell and Rogers have large stakes in media as well as things like cell and phone service.
So I wonder even with Google making these "payments", will any of this money actually make it to reporters and journalist.
The money makes it to Canada. In the worst case scenario it gets to Canadian shareholders. With the framework in place, if tomorrow CP24 gets separated from Bell Media, a part of this money will go to CP24 instead of Bell. Also you don't have to pretend that all Canadian media is owned by ROBeLUS. It won't make it true and it doesn't change the fact that this is compensation for Canadian labor which created wealth for an American corporation.
Yeah, but this $100MM from Google is directly linked to C-18, which links the payments to full-time journalists employed.
So, while I don't love that it'll help a company like Bell's bottom line because it offsets journalist salaries at CTV, and I definitely dislike that the PostMedia and TorStar billionaire owners will undoubtedly just pass through all their journalist subsidies to personal profit, I do like that it will help pay for journalists at the CBC and other editorially or financially independent news sources.
So, not all sunshine in this whole C18 / Google story, but what does all that actually have to do with telcos not building infrastructure?
So we're just subsidizing wages for billion dollar corporations?
All this hullabaloo and it turns out we're just subsidizing billionaires again.
Well, consider that prior to this, Google was paying $0 to support the journalists who were driving web traffic to Google News / Search (besides paying them in exposure, of course), thereby not generating ad revenue for the actual news outlets directly. Meanwhile, Canadian tax dollars were subsidizing journalists' salaries.
Now, Google is supporting newsrooms by being forced through C-18 to pay for the news they're disseminating (and profiting from) to the tune of $100MM next year. That's $100MM in the Canadian Federal Budget that's freed up for other use (or savings).
So, not all bad. It's imperfect legislation, but it appears that the desired outcome of this aspect of C-18 has at least partially come to fruition.
"We're"? Are we all Google shareholders now?
No I'm talking about the legislators. And you're right I shouldn't say "we're", because I never want to be associated with those crooked shit sacks.
Our legislators put all this effort into this, and half the population seems to support it now, but at the end of the day it's just another subsidy for the rich.
Just because the money doesn't come from taxpayers doesn't mean it's not a subsidy. The government spent time and effort to pass legislation that benefits the rich monetarily. That is a subsidy. That the money does not come from taxpayers is a detail they expounded on to win over public opinion, and it worked. People used to be against this.
Reporters will be able to write a story about how the media execs are getting 100 million in new bonuses next year.
That earns them a few pennies!