this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
561 points (98.6% liked)

solarpunk memes

2846 readers
720 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago (5 children)

"unsafe for both"? What is the bike going to do to the car? Scratch the paint? Get blood on the tires?

That said, I agree that separated bike infrastructure saves lives and encourages biking by making people feel safer.

[–] Dabundis 67 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Easy enough to imagine a driver (understandably) swerving to avoid killing a cyclist and losing control of the car

[–] ilikecoffee 45 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Not to mention the psychological effects if an accident does happen.. 'Unsafe' doesn't have to only mean physical injury or death..

[–] FMT99 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's a little melodramatic. I'm 100% on the cyclist side (don't even have a driving licence) but even I can see mixed traffic is dangerous for both.

What driver hits a bike unexpectedly (assuming no intent) and doesn't react in a potentially dangerous way? People crash cars trying to avoid deer even.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As someone who biked everywhere, daily, for years, I would have loved so much to have my own dedicated infrastructure, if only our own separate, Barrier-protected lane in the street.

I've been to cities where they have added in lanes separate from the road, going all over town, and they're usually packed with people using them.

People want this kind of thing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

In some ways, it really feels like city streets were made for people from outside the city driving in for a specific purpose, and public transit, sidewalks, and bike paths are for the people who actually live there.

The whole previous phase of ever-widening streets/highways and paving any open ground for parking almost feels like an attempt to make the cities more like a theme park you drive to and leave at the end of the day. I'm glad things seem to be trending the other way now, with more emphasis on infrastructure I can use living here.

[–] thechadwick 9 points 11 months ago

I mean I get your point, but still agree with op. Running somebody over is unsafe and nothing terrifies me more than backing up in parking lots where kids might dart out unexpectedly.

There's bad drivers everywhere, but I'd hazard a guess that most of them do not want to kill a cyclist either..

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Have you ever hit anything with a car before?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ever seen a deer go thru the windscreen and kill the driver? Same thing can happen with a human

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

My bike is a fat bike with diy motor kit. It's really damn heavy. I wouldn't be surprised if it's on par with a light deer now. I wouldn't want to hit it at all but definitely not with anything smaller than an f150.