this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
270 points (93.8% liked)

News

23326 readers
4258 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would Biden break an Occupy like Obama did?

[–] newthrowaway20 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Obama didn't need to break the occupy wall street moment. That moment was so unorganized that it broke itself.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The media had their role in it too by setting a 'tone' for the whole thing by treating it like a joke from the start and being sure to always interview the kookiest of people whenever they'd visit one of the encampments. Alternatively, conservative outlets like Fox would paint the protestors like a bunch of entitled freeloaders who just wanted to cause problems.

[–] Hnazant 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That clip of the wall street tycoons drinking champagne and laughing at the protesters.

[–] Coreidan 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They weren’t Wall Street tycoons. They were just people attending a wedding.

Why does this misinformation keep spreading?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because, even though that specific photo wasn't about rich people laughing at the protests, you damn well know they all did just that. We just don't have pictures.

[–] Coreidan 5 points 1 year ago

I get the symbolism. But calling something that it isn’t is just flat out disingenuous.

[–] grue 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that's because leftist movements with leaders get Fred Hampton'd.

[–] agitatedpotato 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The amount of figures within OWS and BLM that died under strange circumstances is pretty not comforting knowing the organizations who do things like that have near impunity and control of information.

[–] vxx 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Any sources on the many deaths under strange circumstances?

Feels like the false stories you hear about people that opened tutenchamuns grave.

[–] agitatedpotato 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

6 in Ferguson, probably among the one that made more noise.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/puzzling-number-men-tied-ferguson-protests-have-died-n984261

OWS Demonstrator death here

https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20140811/upper-west-side/ows-demonstrator-found-dead-riverside-park-police-say

Another OWS demonstrator and community organizer

https://www.nydailynews.com/2021/09/23/friends-family-mourn-prominent-occupy-wall-street-protestor-and-nyc-community-organizer/

OWS Demonstrator, Author and powerful community force here, seems less suspicious than the others but also the person is more critical to the movement and had a sizeable reach in his capacity as an author and anthropologist.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/david-graeber-dies-59-occupy-wall-street/

I'd have to ignore a lot of history to consider it impossible for the same people who thought they could control minds with LSD and did put microphones inside Russian street cats to have a hand in this.

There an even older gentleman deeply affiliated with OWS who also passed but again that looks even less suspicious that David Graeber, like the scene is inherently less 'manipulatable' which is not to say its impossible. This is the pattern that a lot of people saw and discussed.

[–] vxx -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So 6 people in a span of 3 years in an area with a life expectancy of 56.

The two in the burned cars were the likeliest related to the protests and murdered, but it's much more likely to be some gang bullshit and not targeted at all.

Wikipedia says this about it:

As of March 2019, Ferguson protesters have continued to receive threats to their lives or wellbeing

The articles you posted mention this

The 2010 U.S. census showed that while people who live in wealthy and mostly white western St. Louis County can expect to live well into their 80s, life expectancy in parts of mostly black north St. Louis County reaches only into the 60s. Life expectancy in Kinloch, a few miles from Ferguson, is 56.

Forty-five of the county’s 60 homicide victims last year were black in a county where less than a quarter of the population is black, according to police statistics.

I don't think it's any conspiracy shenanigans going on and not government members that killed them suspiciously...long after the protests were over. It looks like a horrible place to live, especially for black people without any perspective for a future.

It smells like "I want to believe", not some deep state revenge after the fact.

It doesn't even look like a statistical anomaly that much if you take everything into account.

Here's a link to suicide rates in the US.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db464.pdf

[–] agitatedpotato 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't want to believe it, in fact if someone where to claim ALL of these were not accidents or had something to do with their protest involvement I would wholeheartedly find that ridiculously unlikely, but I remain open to the idea that one or more could be. I remember in an auto-bio from a black panther i read he said something along the lines of him not blaming the cops for breaking up his chapter, that would be giving them too much credit. I like that, I hope they're not some all powerful org that can just disappear who they want.

But then they do things like summary execution of a murder suspect without clearly announcing themselves, say they saw a gun flashed but they found the gun in his pocket. All because he shot (I guess technically allegedly) someone reported to be attacking protestors who happened to be part of a far right group that the police had deals with (they agreed to not execute a warrant on the groups leader). https://theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/01/exclusive-video-shows-portland-officers-made-deal-with-far-right-group-leader

So I fully believe that when the circumstances present themselves, sometimes, someone with the capacity to do something will take that opportunity. Didn't initially include this case because this is something that happened during an arrest, but if this particular instance wasn't a federal hit, nothing short of when they bombed a philly neighborhood block in 85 is. They have the means and unless we believe these federal organizations have changed without any real external pressure to do so, history says they have the will as well.

info about the arrest that was essentially an execution here. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/14/activist-portland-shooting-michael-reinoehl-police

[–] vxx -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nah, you totally want to believe. You said this:

I'd have to ignore a lot of history to consider it impossible for the same people who thought they could control minds with LSD and did put microphones inside Russian street cats to have a hand in this.

How are these stupid agency projects of the past in any way related to supposed murders of rather random protestors that didnt have much influence anymore?

It just doesn't make any sense.

The protest leaders would just vanish during the protests without a trace, and maybe come back siding the government, and not die of suicide years later when they've long stopped being relevant.

An average life Expectancy of 56 years is some 3rd world country in civil war numbers. Burkina Faso is at 62 years for example. Somalia at 58, Chad 55.

[–] agitatedpotato 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since when does not considering something impossible imply wanting to believe?

[–] vxx -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't play dumb. You're totally eating up this conspiracy stuff.

[–] agitatedpotato 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] vxx -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And spy cats from the 70's are your reasoning.

A for effort though, that picture is funny.

You started spreading that killing of protestors conspiracy with confidence. You later saying you don't consider it impossible isn't getting you off the hook.

[–] girlfreddy 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure why you're pushing to be the asshole here, but you're doing a damn fine job of it.

[–] vxx 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm calling him out for spreading completely unfounded and unreasonable conspiracy theories.

As if we wouldn't have enough of this deep state crap pushed by a former president. As if we wouldn't have enough radicalised mindsets.

I'm also not the one calling others names unlike you.

[–] girlfreddy -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] vxx 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Pretty thick coming from the guy calling me an asshole.

I have an argument, you're just trolling and trying to be mean. As long as it makes you less miserable, go ahead.

So you think radicalisation is something to strive for or how do I have to interpret your comment?

[–] girlfreddy 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't have to interpret anything. It's clear you're acting like an whiny asshole, and now you're doubling down ... so here's more 🧀🧀🧀🧀

[–] vxx 1 points 1 year ago
[–] girlfreddy 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Occupy had no central leadership and nobody on earth seems to be able to accept orgs like that. Seems we've been conditioned to believe that everything must be run in a hierarchy.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 4 points 1 year ago

If you were there you developed an appreciation for sanitation. I dropped off food a few times and it smelled horrific.

Some organization is a good thing.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely. Decades of “heros journey” formatted TV and movies does that.

[–] girlfreddy 9 points 1 year ago

The other side of that "hero" coin is whistleblowers in movies/TV who, in rl, are vilified beyond even the real criminals who tank the world's economy selling banded, illegally-authorized mortgages as good investments.

[–] delaunayisation 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, sure, that's why they had the police beat up protesters and journalists.

[–] newthrowaway20 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think police wouldn't have beat them up if they were organized?

[–] Garbanzo 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If they were organized enough you'd just have a pile of dead cops when it was over

[–] AngryCommieKender 3 points 1 year ago

There's no organization that can take on the US police. They are backed up by the national guard. The national guard, historically, has demonstrated a willingness to shoot protesters.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you'd have one dead cop and every protestor dead or in jail. One cop dying is all they need to throw away what little restraint they might have had up to that point. They will kill the people who resist and arrest the ones who don't. If they arrest you they'll drag the trial out for years, by the time you get found guilty and sentenced to a year of probation you'll have spent a decade behind bars.

The problem is that this is not a fair fight, it is a suicide mission for whoever decides to take on the police.

[–] Garbanzo -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, if it goes down like that you weren't organized enough

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You're either trolling or dillusional if you think that. We live in a police state, if you're out in the open they will just kill you and if you take shelter they will literally lay seige to you and burn your house down.