this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
70 points (97.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26987 readers
2531 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In politics most people just critizise each other, but what did your local government actually do a good job on?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cricket97 -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

giving drugs to a drug addict is not helping them, sorry. and giving them money doesn't remove all negative externalities, that is a ridiculous statement. It just makes them less desperate for cash, they are still in a full blown addiction being controlled by the drugs.

[–] twelvefloatinghands 4 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Exactly. They're addicted. They're going to get the drugs one way or another. May as well minimize the harm.

[–] cricket97 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Why don't you give them your money? Go minimize harm in your local community.

Addicts quit because they hit rock bottom. They get to a point where they cannot sustain their lifestyle. You will be preventing them from ever getting to that point and they will be able to sustain their addiction indefinitely. Until the money runs out and they are more addicted than when they started. Free money never lasts forever.

[–] TrickedPrivacy 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’d like to point out that it costs a society much less to supply one with heroin than it does to deal with all the thefts and crime that comes with the user having to fund an illegal black market, not to mention all the stabbings over drug territory.

We need to grow some balls and be adult about this situation, what we’re doing hasn’t worked for the last 50 years.

Misuse of Drugs act has been in place what 50 years now? Consumption rates have increased and so have people getting contaminated drugs/deaths.

Source you may ask? Oh.. only the National Crime Agency on gov.uk

https://nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/nsa-drugs

And we may be nerds but if that means I know what I’m talking about then fuck yeah, beats staying in ones box and regurgitating the statue-quo. - When frontline police say we’re making the problem worse one has to start asking questions.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)