this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
-16 points (39.5% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6355 readers
11 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I do not have children, and I never will, yet my property taxes still go toward paying for schools. I'm happy to have my taxes pay for roads, infastructure improvement, fire, police, and all the other municipal services that benefit me as a resident of the county.

The government needs to determine the cost of educating a child from kindergarten to high school, divide this by 18, and apply it as a yearly tax to parents. Children deserve an education, but children also put an additional strain on society. I should not be forced to pay for someone else's decision to procreate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unpopular take.

The government exists to serve its citizens.

You may not specifically benefit from some programs at this very moment - shall we dismantle them?

Unemployment. Medicare. Libraries. Social security. Road / infrastructure. Low-income food/housing/assistance. Foreign aid. Fire / EMS. Diplomatic services. Police.

At any given time, most people don’t personally benefit from all of these things, but they likely use them at various points in their lives.

You went to school, didn’t you? You already got yours.

[–] corroded -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All those services exist to benefit the public, and while I don't directly benefit from some of them, I'm happy to pay for them as a member of society. Everybody needs to pitch in for society to function.

Having children is different. I'm sure every parent has their own reasons for procreation, but it's their choice to bring a child into the world because they want to. It's their responsibility to raise the child to adulthood.

Once the child is a functioning member of society and is paying taxes like the rest of us, they have every right to enjoy the same public services that I do. Until then, let the parents pay for their own decisions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Society as a whole does not agree with this viewpoint. Let’s drive this home.

Take the US: families with children under a certain income (let’s say $75k, I don’t feel like looking up the specifics) effectively pay no federal taxes. All of their tens of thousands of dollars that would go towards the programs discussed all around this thread instead goes back to them.

Seems unfair right? Instead of parents paying their fair share and shouldering the cost of developing little people, they pay nothing!

Turns out that for government to function for the next year, it needs to plan out its budget. That’s somewhat easy.

How about government functioning in 10 years? Requires some more foresight and projection, but can probably be done with reasonable assumptions.

How about government functioning in 50 years? If we do not build in a layer of population growth, then the numbers get ugly real fast. People retire. People die. People unexpectedly die before it’s their time. With no children born to replace people, society crumbles within a generation or two at most. I think every reasonable person would see these projections and agree that if no new people join society, it ceases to exist. Even for the most selfish people, they will have no support at old age.

You may see supporting the costs of educating children as an unfair burden on everybody else. I don’t agree with that idea, but it’s your right to feel that way. Instead, I ask that you open your mind to expanding the bounds on the concept of educating kids to raising a new generation. Kids cost a shit ton more than just school. They also use medical services. They need to eat. They use public transportation. They consume free media. They do many of the things you do, but you are uncomfortable sponsoring them as we do you.

If nothing else, try to see children as the next generation of humanity. We can always make things more difficult on parents, but we as a species will suffer, and in your very lifetime.

load more comments (1 replies)