this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
866 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

7144 readers
259 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
866
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Stuff like this and the "base" he has created give off pretty harsh trump vibes. Here is a link confirming for those wanting one. Sorry I did not include it originally. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.712106

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kemsat 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This man says hard work while looking like he wouldn’t last 3 days without all the technology that the natives used to survive without. Bruh, we know what hard work is & how to do it, we just don’t give much of a fuck about doing it on your behalf.

So long as you’re still calling them “aboriginals” instead of I dunno like “The First Canadians,” then you’re making it crystal clear that you don’t care about them & you’re just mad that they aren’t letting you use, abuse, or manipulate them.

[–] systemglitch 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Just to be clear it is "The First Canadians" now?

[–] neonspool 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

i've been raised as a Gen Z to learn "first nations", though aboriginal (from the root word aborigine) also means the exact same thing, so i personally don't comprehend how someone can find offense in using that word.

maybe they are used to seeing aboriginals to describe aussi natives? still, it essentially means "first of the region", or in other words, "first of the nation".

[–] Tarkcanis 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's not offensive, but technically "First Nations" is a subgroup; Inuit and Métis being the other two.

[–] ttmrichter 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How can the Métis be "first" anything? They're the product of intermarriage between native Canadians and European traders (mostly the French).

[–] Tarkcanis 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, that's why First Nations refers to the folks directly decended from Native Canadians (culturally anyway), and not the Métis/Inuit.

Ad. Yes, the Inuit are Native Canadian but they prefer Inuit, and they're very culturally distinct. (Not that the array of first nations cultures aren't)

[–] ttmrichter 0 points 11 months ago

Ah. I'd misunderstood what you meant. I thought you were including the Métis among the First Nations. My bad.

[–] kemsat 3 points 11 months ago

I just made that up but maybe? lol I dunno

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

He has never held a job outside politics so that is the reason he looks as though he has never done a days work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is indigenous frowned upon too? I don't want to be rude, but I can't keep up.

[–] neonspool 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

indigenous, aboriginal, and aborigine, mean exactly the same thing. anyone getting offended at any of these word usages probably doesn't know the definiton.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Aboriginal should be same as indigenous, but "aborigine" is a racist term (due to historical usage) for the original peoples of Australia. I've never heard of it being used for anyone outside Australia.