this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
665 points (88.2% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2768 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] johnnycashsguitar 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm curious what makes milk bad for you. Could someone explain this? I understand why it is bad for the climate, but not why it's bad for human health provided you can digest lactose properly.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a similar issue to why gluten became a fad diet, once the public zeitgeist got the idea that some people can't digest gluten properly people started thinking that maybe no one should eat gluten and the hucksters followed suit.

Do not believe any scammer who tries to tell you that milk is somehow not healthy or that the dairy industry is some kind of scam trying to poison America.

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why would the people pointing out how unhealthy milk is be the ones that are the scammers? What would they have to gain from it? Why is milk promoted so very hard as a "health" drink? Not enough people seem to ask themselves this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The same reason why people try to tell you that vaccines are bullshit but if you buy their essential oils you'll live forever. People try to discredit the mainstream and proven treatment in favor of quackery that they happen to sell at an inflated price.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Milk is "vaccines" in this situation. People are telling us milk is bullshit, but if we buy into veganism, we'll live forever. While the Mayo Clinic reminds people that plant based milks are just generally not as healthy as dairy milk. Soymilk comes close if it is both fortified and unsweetened, but it's still second-best. Good enough for someone who is already a vegan, but definitely not good enough for someone to stop drinking milk if they already do.

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but what are they going to sell? Also, I don't think milk as a health drink is really all that mainstream any more, or becoming increasingly less so over time. I think people are still sputtering along on what they might have been told ages ago, or what they were told by the dairy council.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Militant Veganism involves the desire to convince people to stop eating animal products at all costs. Just look at nutritionstudies.org. When you have a bunch "plant-based nutrition" sites that disagree with the Mayo Clinic and various cancer research organizations, it definitely gets problematic.

Why is milk promoted so very hard as a “health” drink?

Per the Mayo Clinic: "it’s tough to beat dairy milk for balanced nutrition". That's why. With a few caveats (which I cover below), it is one of the most perfectly balanced foods a human can consume.

Here's a question I don't think enough people seem to ask. When cancer patients are encouraged to drink milk, and study after study fails to find a strong correlative or causal link between milk and cancer, why are so many vegan sites claiming it causes or worsens cancer. If I were a cancer patient, should I be trusting nutritionstudies.org and some vegan redditors/lemmings more than, say, Cancer Research UK? Or the Australia Cancer Council?

The problem is that "why does EVERYONE say this is so healthy?!?" is similar to "there's no evidence of this person committing a crime, so it must be a massive cover-up"... Or maybe EVERYONE says it is so healthy because it is so healthy.

Not saying it's a magical wonderdrink. Drinking calories is still an obesity risk. And people with lactose intolerance need to be careful or have a lactase enzyme with their milk. Of course the dairy industry wants you to drink 5000 glasses of milk per day. So don't listen to them, and equally don't listen to the militant vegans. Listen to medical and nutrition experts who don't have some sort of agenda.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

It isn't healthy in the same way candy bars with added vitamins aren't healthy: it's a bunch of sugar and fat you don't need with some protein and calcium somewhere in there.

But maybe you want it anyways, because it's yummy.

[–] dangblingus 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not bad for human health at all. Bullshit myths pushed on social media.

[–] Jeremyward 6 points 1 year ago

Well it is high in fat and calories, it's totally fine in moderation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a lot of cholesterol in cows milk for a start.

[–] trashgirlfriend 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Dietary cholesterol isn't unhealthy

[–] arin 6 points 1 year ago

That's what big dairy wants you to think

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] trashgirlfriend 1 points 1 year ago

If you eat 20 eggs for lunch every day, you might have an issue.

[–] tmjaea 1 points 1 year ago

Saturated fats, hormones, antibiotics, bacteria (only if consumed raw)

Consuming over 1.25 liters of milk a day increases the risk of prostate cancer (however also decreases risk of colon cancer)

It's also not only bad for the climate but also for the cows who have to be impregnated and giving birth before there is any milk

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not. The Mayo Clinic clearly states that milk is healthier than plant milks. Fortified soymilk is their second-best.

While there are saturated fats in cow milk, it's a low enough percent of calories that you can drink any amount of milk and still never cross the "healthy to unhealthy" line.

Also, be wary of people quoting nutritionstudies.org as it's a vegan propaganda mill with a founder that likes to make claims that are either unsubstantiated or rejected by medical experts and nutritionists in general. Using one of the cited references from that site "nobody needs to drink milk", he claims that casein causes tumor growth. There is a weak correlation between casein intake and tumor growth that puts it in the same category of "may possibly cause cancer" as hundreds of things you do every day (to add, there's similar evidence that dairy "may possibly" prevent some forms of cancer). Milk is not known to cause or worsen cancer, nor even **likely to ** cause/worsen cancer, from a scientific point of view. More frustrating, milk's nutritional balance and high protein makes it something doctors generally encourage cancer patients to drink.