this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
199 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18987 readers
3270 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TallonMetroid 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Be hilarious if they do oust him and we end up with a Dem speaker instead.

[–] inclementimmigrant 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It won't but it's nice to dream, the more likelihood it's the nightmare of a Greene speakership.

[–] clearedtoland 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Might as well throw Boberts name in there too.

Edit. Please don’t.

[–] Orbituary 5 points 1 year ago

Tits Mcgee is going to promise everyone in the House a handy if they vote her in as speaker.

[–] Ensign_Crab 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dog that caught the car if that happened. I don't see how you could better broadcast his incompetence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I welcome the circus

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's for this reason I'd actually support a few dems, either safe or from moderate districts crossing the aisle to help. McCarthy is an ass, but he was willing to be an adult (mind you 5 seconds from too little too late) to get this done and I'd rather him than the alternative during the next 45 days.

Besides, it's a wonderful opportunity to neuter the freedom cocks.

[–] Pohl 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is no threat in the motion to vacate. I doubt they follow through. Potential outcomes:

  1. The vote for a few days and are forced to give up and KM remains speaker.

  2. GOP members from moderate districts decide there future is more secure if they join the Democratic Party and Jeffries gets the gavel.

  3. The house remains without a speaker until the session ends.

There is no possible outcome where a more conservative member gets the gavel. None.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The threat is #3. From the perspective of the Freedom Caucus, Congress being paralyzed and unable to act is a win condition.

[–] Pohl 1 points 1 year ago

Number 3 is an unstable condition that will quickly collapse into scenario 1 or 2. There are 18 gop members from districts Biden won in 2020. They can get elected as moderate dems easily if they want.

Game theory wise it goes like this. They call the motion and a speaker vote process starts. No winner (#3). Dems work quietly to see if they can forge a majority(#2), KM works quietly to try and pull a few dems. Getting dem votes for McCarthy is almost impossible (he needs too many and there just aren’t a lot of marginal dem members). If word gets out that either of those scenarios are looking fruitful, the freedom caucus will fold at the next vote (#1)

The likelihood of them having to fold after a day or two of votes and re-seat McCarthy is 9 in 10 or better. That other 1 in 10 is speaker Jeffries speaking for a new dem majority of 1 or 2 seats.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

From their perspective, if they don’t follow through, they will be worried they will be flanked by those that will call them cowards. Also, if they cave, they lose the power they had.

They are not good tacticians, but blowing things up is their thing, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they try to remove him and leave the house without a leader.