this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
1068 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19074 readers
6441 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There it is, plain as day. He literally just admitted to his crimes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dangblingus 67 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Don't you guys know anything? Words have zero meaning anymore. From "literally" to "pov", no one really understands how to use the english language anymore. Trump is a practitioner of the "that's not what I meant" school of communication. GWB had clearer thoughts.

[–] Atomdude 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In all things I yearn for the past. Modern fashions seem to keep on growing more and more debased. I find that even among the splendid pieces of furniture built by our master cabinetmakers, those in the old forms are the most pleasing. And as for writing letters, surviving scraps from the past reveal how superb the phrasing used to be. The ordinary spoken language has also steadily coarsened. People used to say "raise the carriage shafts" "raise it" or "trim it."When they should say, "Let the men of the palace staff stand forth!" they say, "Torches! Let's have some light!" Instead of calling the place where the lectures on the Sutra of the Golden Light are delivered before the emperor "the Hall of the Imperial Lecture," they shorten it to "the Lecture Hal", a deplorable corruption, an old gentleman complained.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This comment is straight fire, no cap

[–] havokdj 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

? Words have zero meaning anymore.

yeah if you're a fucking moron. the rest of us use these things to communicate for fuck's sake, don't let this idiot ruin language next.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

And the word 'aesthetic' ... please add that to the list.

[–] Imotali 7 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately for him "that's not what I meant" is a pretty terrible legal defense since we don't need what he "meant"

If "what it sounds like to a reasonable listener" is "I did the crime, it was my decision, I'm guilty" then he's guilty.

What he meant is irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure what you mean connecting Trump to the word “literally.”

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The word "literally" now often means "metaphorically"

[–] Atomdude 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's literally like language is a constantly changing thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm fine with language evolving over time, but words don't just assume their antonym's meaning because young people use the internet.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

“Literally” was coined in the 16th century and has been used metaphorically since the 17th century, which is 80% of its history. Not everything began with the internet.

[–] DarthBueller 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But... they're not speaking metaphorically or figuratively in this case. He literally admitted to the crime. No antonymic switchery here, friend.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The word was coined in the 1500s. It’s been used metaphorically since the 1600s. That’s ~80% of the word’s existence.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Now” as in “the past 400 years?”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Did I say I agree with the premise? I'm just explaining what was obviously meant