116
US military asks for help to find missing F-35 fighter jet after ‘mishap’ sees pilot eject
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
116 points (98.3% liked)
News
22872 readers
4274 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm confused why they don't know why the pilot ejected, can't they ask him, is he unconscious, does the plane not send back telemetry data?
Also it's in the lake, it's obviously in the lake because it was anywhere else would be fireball. So what the hell is the public going to do, turn up with a massive metal detector?
There are so many questions this story raises and none of them are answered.
The reason the pilot ejected is unknown to the publication, not the military.
Also, it looks like the entire article is based on a boilerplate tweet informing the public that an investigation is underway, everybody's safe, and if you have information please contact them.
If you want to write a click-bait article based on no information, this is how you do it.
Planes can and often do land themselves without pilots on board. It's not a graceful setdown, but it's far from guaranteed to be a fireball. They just gradually lose altitude until they reach the ground, which if it is sufficiently flat, they then scuff across until they come to a stop.
Not how it works for jets, where losing your engine is pretty much a guaranteed crash.
Regular (e.g. passenger) planes have massive wings that work with the air to keep the plane in the air efficiently, at the cost of maneuverability.
That's assuming the engines went bad.
"Planes often land gracefully without pilots on board"
Doubt a jet would do that, with or without an engine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornfield_Bomber
Unless, like you said, they lose one or more engines, because military jets generally don't have great glide ratios.
Most new jets are fly by wire (f35 is one of these, where as the link you posted was about an aircraft which was not), they are inherently aerodynamically unstable, below a certain speed it's just gonna stall and crash not glide to the ground. We use computers to manage the instability as the instability aids in maneuverability. Passenger planes and the like are not designed like this, so they can, in theory, just glide down, but the glide slope is what will determine if it's gonna be a soft or deadly landing.
Yeah but they're going to hit some bumpy ground or a tree or a car or a cow or a house or something. It's not exactly a flat landscape up there