this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
289 points (88.7% liked)

News

23435 readers
3316 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lyft is introducing a new feature that lets women and non-binary riders choose a preference to match with drivers of the same gender.

The ride-hailing company said it was a “highly requested feature” in a blog post Tuesday, saying the new feature allows women and non-binary people to “feel that much more confident” in using Lyft and also hopefully encourage more women to sign up to be drivers to access its “flexible earning opportunities.”

The service, called “Women+ Connect,” is rolling out in the coming months. Riders can turn on the option in the Lyft app, however the company warns that it’s not a guarantee that they’ll be matched with a women or non-binary person if one of those people aren’t nearby. Both the riders and drivers will need to opt-in to the feature for it work and riders must chose a gender for it to work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] exussum -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you could empathize, then you'd understand how shitty of a sentence, "WhAt abOUT BlAckS," is. Or, "It's okay to ignore the problem 'cause it's not fair to men."

Really think about it. Guys have no choice but to not have the option. What is taken away? This is the same BS as, "Why do we need a lactation room? MEN can't use it." "How come women get days off for their PMS-related things, I don't menstruate."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm just calling out discrimination by comparing it to discrimination. Just because you think one is better than the other doesn't mean other people do.

[–] exussum -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I'm guessing affirmative action is discrimination?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This is just getting butthurt for an absolutely silly reason and simultaneously showing no empathy at all.

Let's get the facts down:

  • For men nothing changes.

  • Women are disproportionately affected by sexual harassment and assault by male drivers.

  • Women and non-binary people get the option to use a probably paid feature to have drivers of their own gender because the companies want more customers and women and non-binary people don't use their service since they are scared.

The reaction here in the comments isn't "omg I didn't know it was so unsafe for some people to use these services" or "good for them to make more people feel safe". No.

The reaction is: "Why do THEY get a feature I don't?? I demand to also get this, they shouldn't have something I can't have!! Sexist misandrists!"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. The reaction isn't "I want this service too" it's "this service is morally wrong".

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How is that morally wrong? It does not hurt anybody and makes some people feel more safe.

[–] exussum -4 points 1 year ago

Marry me. Feels like so many people here miss the point.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You'd probably defend a Nazi getting punched

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they haven't hurt anyone and they're merely using their free speech then I would not defend assault and battery on them. Just because their ideas and speech are deplorable does not give you the right to assault them.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry for not being a piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The opposite actually, you'd prefer to platform outright hateful people than aggressively remove them to show that they aren't welcome.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You seem to equate in difference to all as agreement to the worst. That's not how any of this should work.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something something a Nazi walks into a bar, I'm sure you've read this story on here.

Being indifferent will just allow the problem to fester, sure maybe you aren't on the streets shouting down minorities with them, but you are just letting them go about doing their thing because they have this magical right to their terrible harmful opinions

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's only a problem if you have no rebuttal. Fight speech with speech. If you can't win, that's your problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah yes, nazis, famous for listening to reason

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

And the audience doesn't need to be exposed to that crap in the first place

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You think the point is to convince them otherwise? That would be nice but no. The point is to make sure others aren't convinced by their arguments. If there's nobody else around to be convinced then you just ignore them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, it is a valid argument. Since women are often uncomfortable around men they don’t know, it does seem fair to give them an option to avoid male Lyft drivers. What if someone is uncomfortable with a black driver? It is a similar situation.

Honestly, if I were a woman I would possibly use this feature. Personal safety goes above any moral ideals that I may be tooting around. That’s why I’m kind of split about this. People should be able to feel as safe and comfortable as possible, but male drivers shouldn’t feel like they’re less preferred by a portion of Lyft’s users.

[–] exussum 1 points 1 year ago

You're talking in circles. The problem is because men are the largest perpetrator, well also being the biggest benefactor of being a man. They are literally on both ends. Women on the other hand are largely targeted by men for crimes of various sorts, well also not benefiting from the patriarchy.

Hell they have to have separate train cars for women in japan because men can't keep their hands to themselves.

There is nothing societal that benefits black drivers. That's exactly the point. There is no equity here. If I'm a black driver, chances are I'm already on the back foot. People might cancel their rides once they see me, or bring cops into play and have other violence brought against me. Remember that one black dude in Central Park who was bird watching and had a woman start accusing him of stuff.

Don't put women further on the back foot. Don't put persons of color on the back foot. Cis white men already have the advantage in so many ways.

It's not funny anymore.