this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
610 points (91.9% liked)

Canada

7210 readers
444 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Staccato 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The article was a fun read, but for readers who don't have time, I believe Orwell's essay "Politics and the English Language" describes the same problem with marginally fewer words. My favorite excerpt, though, really nails exactly the BS your article mentioned:

Now that I have made this catalogue of swindles and perversions, let me give another example of the kind of writing that they lead to. This time it must of its nature be an imaginary one. I am going to translate a passage of good English into modern English of the worst sort. Here is a well-known verse from Ecclesiastes:

I returned and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.

Here it is in modern English:

Objective consideration of contemporary phenomena compels the conclusion that success or failure in competitive activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity, but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be taken into account.

This is a parody, but not a very gross one.

Peterson's writings are worse than Orwell's own parodies.

[–] JargonWagon 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The philosopher of language Paul Grice introduced the concept in his pragmatic theory, argued such:

Make your contribution such as is required, at the stage at which it occurs, by the accepted purpose or direction of the talk exchange in which you are engaged.[1]:β€Š45β€Š

Oh the irony lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I’d not heard of this essay, I’ll have to check it out. Thank you for sharing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pro tip, if you place > on the empty lines you'll make one continuous quote.

Like

this.

[–] Staccato 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wild... in Sync, it reads as a continuous quote. I guess you're using a different interface

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Website. Also Jerboa does the same. I imagine Sync behaves that way because that's what reddit did.

I actually prefer this version, it allows you to separate quotes without having to put anything in between.