this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
612 points (90.9% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2702 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

100% renewable energy is not possible on our current electrical grids. We usually use more energy at night where renewable does not cover our peak energy requirements, therefore, as a carbon neutral energy source nuclear covers that peak perfectly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

alternatively, address the shortcomings of the power grid

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Instead of "alternatively" let's say "in addition". We're not going to solve anything with a single solution we need nuclear, we need solar and other renewables, and we need to upgrade the grid. All at the same time.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Precisely this, you can't fix it, if you do not make an effort.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Downvoted cause you are technically correct. Technical problems are not solved by downvotes and good will.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Solar isn’t the only renewable energy, and not even the only one you can install per household. Geothermal never stops, can be installed in your lawn, and has almost zero maintenance. Wave generation and offshore wind farms also provide round the clock energy.

[–] fubo 3 points 1 year ago

Geothermal power is a lot easier in (say) Iceland than in places with less volcanism.

[–] partial_accumen 1 points 1 year ago

Geothermal never stops, can be installed in your lawn, and has almost zero maintenance

If you're talking residential geothermal, that won't generate electricity for your home. It can be used for HVAC and water heating though. It isn't zero maintenance, and for most people it is pretty expensive (because they don't have enough land to use the cheaper method for laying the pipes in the ground. Also, call it what it is - Ground-sourced heat pump. Average install price is $30k-$70k.

In many latitudes Air-sourced heat pumps are much much less expensive and perform nearly as well.

I'm hopeful to see cheap to purchase, install, and maintain Ground-sourced heat pump (residential Geothermal) but its not hear yet.

[–] nicksline -2 points 1 year ago

Yeah I've heard rivers stop flowing at night, it's never windy at night, the ocean is still at night etc

[–] dangblingus -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nuclear isn't carbon neutral. How do you think Uranium gets mined/processed/shipped/utilized? The reaction may use/generate no carbon, but the entirety of the logistics of producing nuclear power absolutely does. Saying it's carbon neutral is a bold faced lie.

[–] Maltese_Liquor 9 points 1 year ago

If we want to start discussing the material processing effort then it's going to be pretty hard to call any energy source carbon neutral. The concrete for dams and the steel for windmills don't appear out of thin air.