this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
1627 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19143 readers
3057 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

will the secret service have to guard him when he's in prison? Questions that keep me up at night lol

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've said this before but the obvious solution is to reopen Guantanamo and just leave him there.

He'll have to fend off the seagulls himself.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Guantanamo never closed

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Alkatraz sounds cooler though.

[–] FlyingSquid 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No way am I going to let him ruin Alcatraz. That was the best audio tour I ever had and I don't want to have to hear him yelling bullshit over the headphones. They aren't noise-cancelling.

Seriously though, I highly recommend it if you're in San Francisco. You go through the building hearing testimonies from former prisoners and guards all while the sounds of the prison's various areas, whichever one you happen to be in, play in the background while you walk through it. It's amazingly immersive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It would be ironic to have him in prison in California.

[–] dynamojoe 2 points 1 year ago

I concur. I'd recomment the evening tour if they still offer it.

[–] TechyDad 6 points 1 year ago

My favorite option is have the government take over Mar-A-Lago. Trump stays in one room - which gets stripped to just the bare walls with a prison cot tossed in. Nobody else - except for Secret Service or support staff like janitors and cooks - are allowed in.

At mealtime, he's marched down the bare glass hallways to the empty dining area where he's served standard prison food. Then he's marched right back to his room. Let him rot as a shell of a man in the shell of the complex he loved so much.

[–] meldroc 2 points 1 year ago

We could call France's ambassador and ask if we could borrow Devil's Island...

[–] Feirdro 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Secret service bringing him cakes with metal files.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That old man in no way has the strength, or endurance, to file through steel bars even if we gave him a Dremel. Ain't no rasp going to help him.

[–] troglodytis 1 points 1 year ago

Files, softer than the metal they are meant to cut through. Everyday.

[–] Nightwingdragon 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Trump is entitled to Secret Service protection for life. This is not only to prevent a former President, but also what's in his head.

It's already been pretty much established that if Trump goes to jail, the Secret Service protects him there as well. How that would work is a logistical nightmare that hasn't yet been sorted out, and is one of the reasons that judges haven't jailed him already -- its a can of worms that's going to have to be opened at some point, but nobody wants to be the one to have to open the can.

[–] Phlogiston 9 points 1 year ago

Can anybody explain why thats a logistical nightmare. Seems pretty simple to me: he's in a fucking jail cell in a secure building and the secret service protects him like they do in any other place; except easier because its a secure location.

Sure, he can't be in general population. But don't they have other inmates like that? Just do what they do then (I guess he gets a cell to himself; maybe gets his meals delivered).

I don't see why thats more than a minor paperwork glitch. Surely we've had inmates before that need to be reasonably protected from other inmates. Heck, I'll bet gitmo is ready to handle it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is not only to prevent a former President,

if only they could prevent trump.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is why they'll give him house arrest at best.

[–] meldroc 1 points 1 year ago

I'm thinking the Dept. of Corrections will have to build a facility just for Trump. It'll be like Spandau Prison in Germany, a prison with just one prisoner.

Maybe they'll repurpose a wing of a prison to be the Trump wing....

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Let's just build him a tiny house in Northern Alaska that has no running water. He and his loyalist SS men who deleted all the texts can be stationed out there until he dies of old age 4 months later

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I assume the most reasonable solution would be house arrest. It would be nice to see him in a jail cell, but that seems impossible.

[–] meldroc 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, they'll keep Trump very safe as he's making license plates!