this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
296 points (99.0% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
320 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Two years after ValΓ©rie Plante's administration said a new housing bylaw would lead to the construction of 600 new social housing units per year, the city hasn't seen a single one.

The Bylaw for a Diverse Metropolis forces developers to include social, family and, in some places, affordable housing units to any new projects larger than 4,843 square feet.

If they don't, they must pay a fine or hand over land, buildings or individual units for the city to turn into affordable or social housing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds to me like the fines need to be bigger.

[–] ladicius 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not a fine, it's a price.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

In that case the price needs to be uneconomical

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just start seizing rentals already.

[–] jackoneill 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seriously. Everybody keeps their family home. Anybody with income earning property gets that turned over to the state to be converted into affordable state run family housing to give the market a reasonable floor and get more people able to own their own family home

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Probably start with the investment firms and mass landlords and we might never even need to get to individual landowners.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1 to 3 units > can be owned by anyone

4 to 8 units > need to be registered as a company

9 units or more > owned by a non profit crown corporation

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, like, if you reduced the number of rentals and made it uneconomical to build rentals, would you expect the cost of rent to go up or down?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Society can build things without a profit motive.

Housing should be a human right, so rent abolition is next after expropriation of land leeches.