this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
627 points (92.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27193 readers
4147 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'll eat my hat after convicted and sentenced and not a second sooner.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Don't look at the conviction rate for federal prosecutors then. And stock up on BBQ sauce. A NY jury would convict Trump of just being fat and ugly, that's how much everyone (including Republicans) hate him. People literally go out of their way to make their dogs pee on Trump Tower.

You will just change your mind and say "He should have gotten more time! 5 years is nothing. House arrest? His house is huge!"

For a former president, that's the worst possible.

[–] bassomitron 32 points 1 year ago

Republican voters absolutely still love him. Just look at early polling for the GOP primaries, he's still leading by a huge landslide in the majority of states: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/31/us/politics/2024-poll-nyt-siena-trump-republicans.html

Is it depressing as hell that so many people are still obsessed with this corrupt, shitty buffoon? Definitely. But I keep seeing more and more comments on here acting like Trump is irrelevant and his base is virtually non-existent when that's just not true (which is ironic, given how one of the main criticisms against Trump and his ilk is their detachment from reality).

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe people in Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Manhattan hate him, but Staten Island, Long Island, and upstate NY are Trump country

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where do you think all the people live? It's not Staten Island.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

TIL nobody lives on Staten Island.

Guess it’s all vampires.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll sit on the laurel of all the presidents who have been convicted of their crimes so far.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While you're looking at them, compare their average approval ratings. Trump has the lowest of them all, having never broken 50% approval.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure that will really hamper him in the popularity contest portion of the trial but he will pick those back up in the swimsuit contest.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I get what you're saying, but yuck

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

conviction rate for federal prosecutors

The thing is that they, like state and local prosecutors, prosecute poor people who can't afford effective representation tens if not hundreds of times as often.

If you isolate their stats with regards to rich and/or powerful defendants like the Mango Mussolini, suddenly they don't convict at anywhere near that rate.

The difference is so immense that even an obviously guilty oaf with incompetent and unhinged lawyers like him is more likely than not to win or at the very least delay until his own death at his country club home.

[–] Ya_Boy_Skinny_Penis 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh so you "isolated the stats" then.

Great, share them!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even though it doesn't seem like you're gonna argue in good faith, here's a review of a book about it.

[–] Ya_Boy_Skinny_Penis 1 points 1 year ago

Oh God, I don't even know where to start. How do you "argue in good faith" with someone who cites a book revire as evidence? And then you bother to look at the book reviee and it says nothing about winning at trial/after charging due to wealth?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Such a high win rate for federal prosecutions is indicative of a problem. Whether that be only taking cases which they are assured victory or winning against those who are not guilty, they're both wrong.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The criminal justice system is intended to be biased in favor of the defendants as innocent until proven guilty. Consequently, if everything were working perfectly, I'd expect prosecutors to only charge people if they were extremely confident that they could prove the person's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Taking cases without solid evidence and regularly losing at trial would be indicative of a major problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

If prosecutors lost more cases, that would mean they were being even more aggressive in over-prosecuting flimsy cases.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Especially when you dig a little deeper and look into socio-economic and racial ratios of both prosecutions in general and convictions.

It's a system by and for the rich and powerful, designed to protect people exactly like Trump while criminalizing poverty and melanin.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm eat my hat either way because I have a problem

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

But it’s certainly nice to see that the path towards that situation is still open.