this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
876 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

60055 readers
3751 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kluevo 60 points 1 year ago (5 children)

huh

That... Actually seems like not that bad of an idea (at least for forum/reddit/lemmy bots)

Well, if you ignore the infeasibility aspect of getting the humans to cooperate and stuff

[–] saltesc 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, if you ignore the infeasibility aspect of getting the humans to cooperate and stuff

Don't you fucking tell me what to do!

gets mace

[–] CIA_chatbot 12 points 1 year ago

Yes silly humans, fight amongst yourselves

[–] T156 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wasn't that basically the intention behind the Upvote and Downvote systems in Lemmy, StackExchange/Overflow, Reddit, or old YouTube? The idea being that helpful, constructive comments would get pushed to the top, whereas unhelpful or spam comments get pushed to the bottom (and automatically hidden).

It's just that it didn't really work out quite the same way in practice due to botting, people gaming the votes, or the votes not being used as expected.

[–] Greenskye 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep the flaw is assuming that humans would actually select for constructive comments. It's a case where humans claim that's what they want, but human actions do not reflect this. We'd eventually build yet another 'algorithm that picks what immediately appeals to most users' rather than 'constructive'. You'd also see the algorithm splinter along ideological lines as people tend to view even constructive comments from ideologies they disagree with unfavorably

[–] d3Xt3r 2 points 1 year ago

That's just a flaw in implementation. Look at the system implemented by Slashdot, still works to this day.

[–] davidgro 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bots on Reddit already steal parts of upvoted comments and post them elsewhere in the same post to get upvotes themselves (so the account can be used for spam later)

Even with context they can be very difficult to spot sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Is it really such a bad thing when the humans that are unable to cooperate do not get access?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The title text on the comic

And what about all the people who won't be able to join the community because they're terrible at making helpful and constructive co- ... oh.

[–] kluevo 2 points 1 year ago

Sometimes you might need an urgent answer (eg, overflowing sink or a weird smell coming from an appliance problem) and don't have time to fill out a serious form

[–] new_guy 4 points 1 year ago

But what if someone else makes a bot not to answer things but to rate randomly if an answer is constructive or not?