this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
1964 points (97.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9888 readers
1 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 135 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

After widening was completed in 2008, a portion of the highway west of Houston is now also believed to be the widest in the world, at 26 lanes when including feeders. - (Wikipedia)

WTF

[–] thatwill 118 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And despite the extra lanes, it's still gridlocked. Maybe they need just one more lane...

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I SWEAR BRO JUST ONE MORE LANE, ONE MORE LANE WILL BE ENOUGH!!!"

[–] DrQuint 21 points 1 year ago

Unironically a single bike lane off to the side might have eased up traffic.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I e moved out of Houston but if i recall correctly they also removed the rail line that was adjacent to this highway for the expansion.

There was a killer hamburger place off like Gessner that i still miss.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

An old railway running along the north side of the freeway was demolished in 2002 in preparation for construction which began in 2004.

Form the wiki article linked above

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is Houston aware that some cities pay hundreds of millions of dollars to install a rail line to address this exact problem?

[–] njordomir 8 points 1 year ago

Disused rail lines are a RoW life raft for American cities. I cycle in a very hilly area and rail trails and trails along waterways have nicely mild grades compared to the rest of the state. Electric trams could easily co-exist with a cycle path next to them. I just hope we're smart enough to recognize these chunks of land as a gift from the past and not give them up or develop them inappropriately (aka freeway expansions)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Well that stretch of highway is called the “energy corridor” and all the big oil companies have their headquarters there… bp, chevron, conoco, etc.

So to answer your question: No. they seem unaware.

[–] Thisisforfun 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That sounds like extremely bad planning. In essence they could have had several smaller highways that better suited the needs of the users without forcing them all onto this clusterfuck.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife 32 points 1 year ago

Highway planners are constrained by the fact that these roads can only be run through poor and usually black neighborhoods.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's already another highway 4 miles north and 4 miles south of it. There's some 2-lane each way roads between, but anything bigger or more grade-separated would be further isolate communities, take away alternative transportation routes, and take away greenspace.

[–] Blamemeta 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Includes the express lanes and the frontage roads. It really shouldn't, you aren't supposed to just drive the entire trip on the frontage roads.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meaning it's even wider than 26 lanes because of the space between the feeder and the highway, the extra shoulders, and barriers to the express lanes.

[–] Blamemeta -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But its Texas, we have space. Isn't the point that its too many lanes/cars, not the space?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Too much space taken up by non-places means more distance between places, increasing dependence on cars, requiring more lanes, which take up space.