this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
141 points (98.0% liked)

Canada

7230 readers
588 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Abortion rights group places remaining 15 Conservatives on list of anti-choice MPs after vote on ‘fetal rights’ bill

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

this is just a virtue signal to begin with. And the argument against it is just a signal too.

It's almost like the politicians are playing politics.

I feel like sentencing should be based on forseeable harms, not victim characteristics.

Parliament shouldn't put pregnant people above people with other vulnerabilities.

if abortion becomes illegal they could use this bill to say doctors willfully causes harm to a pregnant woman.

I think the concern is more along the lines of, if there is a court case seeking to recognize the personhood of a fetus, then anti choice folks will point to this law and say "see there is precedent, the criminal code considers pregnant women to have more rights" and a biased Supreme Court can use this as a fig leaf to overturn abortion rights.